Cited by 110Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeRetinal and Macular Surgery

Undertreatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration after 10 Years of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in the Real World: The Need for A Change of Mindset

Monés, Jordi, Singh, Rishi P., Bandello, Francesco, Souied, Eric, Liu, Xin, Gale, Richard·2020·Ophthalmologica

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the gap between visual acuity (VA) outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies in clinical trials and real-world practice, and explore the reasons for this gap. Methods: The literature was searched from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, for studies reporting VA gains and injection frequencies in clinical trials and real-world practice. Results: Clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents and their extension studies demonstrated initial VA gains maintained at 4 years and beyond (up to 7 years) with continuous proactive treatment. Visual outcomes correlated with injection frequency. In real-world practice, patients are usually undertreated, accounting for the VA decline over time. Reasons for undertreatment include the burden of injections and monitoring visits imposed on patients/caregivers. However, another primary reason is the general mindset in the ophthalmological community that sustained benefits with treatment are not possible, leading to poor compliance and creating a vicious circle. Conclusions: Initial VA gains can be maintained with more intensive/proactive approaches. Promising new treatments requiring less frequent injections/monitoring will help in the near future; meanwhile, better results could be achieved by changing the community mindset that contributes to undertreatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000502747

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated injections may take a significant toll on the patients' emotional wellbeing and quality of life, adversely affecting adherence and potentially leading to undertreatment and deterioration of the condition.

    “The repeated injections may take a significant toll on the patients’ emotional wellbeing and quality of life [11, 69], adversely affecting adherence and potentially leading to undertreatment and deterioration of the condition [70].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, et al.; MARINA Study Group. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-re- lated macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct; 355(14): 1419-31.
  2. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, Ying GS, Jaffe GJ, Grunwald JE, Toth C, Redford M, Ferris FL 3rd: Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related mac- ular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthal- mology. 2012 Jul; 119(7): 1388-98.
  3. Marcus DM: Neovascular age-related macu- lar degeneration (nAMD) in an open-label extension of the VIEW1 study. Invest Oph- thalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(13): 3943.
  4. McGrath LA, Lee LR. Characteristics of pa- tients who drop out from ranibizumab thera- py. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2013 Sep- Oct; 2(5): 295-9.
  5. Stokes J, Chang AA. Adherence and persis- tence with anti-VEGF treatment for AMD. Mivision. 2016; 114: 51-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monés, J., Singh, R. P., Bandello, F., Souied, E., Liu, X., & Gale, R.
Affiliations
  • Barcelona Macula Foundation (ES)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil (FR)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Monés, Jordi
Venue
Ophthalmologica
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019-11-19
Volume
243
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0030-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0267
OpenAlex
W2989989541
Cited by
110
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, undertreatment, visual acuity outcomes, medication adherence, injection frequency, real-world practice, patient burden
MeSH terms
Ranibizumab, Humans, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Wet Macular Degeneration, Intravitreal Injections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review