Cited by 13Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Evaluation of the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment and mortality risk in neonates with early-onset infection

Open access
Yeo, Kee Thai, Goh, Guan Lin, Park, Woo Yeon, Wynn, James L., Aziz, Khyzer B.·2023·Neonatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The discriminative utility of the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) for early-onset sepsis (EOS) mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine the utility of nSOFA for EOS mortality. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of NICU patients with EOS between 2012 and 2023. nSOFA scores of survivors and non-survivors were compared, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) for mortality was calculated. RESULTS: 104 subjects were identified (88 lived, 16 died). AUROC at blood culture collection (T0), 6 h after collection (T6), and the maximum nSOFA at T0 or T6 (T0-6max) were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.91), 0.89 (0.80, 0.99), and 0.87 (0.77, 0.97), respectively. Analyses restricted to birthweight (<1.5, <1 kg) or gestational age (<32, <29 week) cutoffs revealed AUROC ranges of 0.86-0.92 for T6 and 0.82-0.84 for T0-6max. CONCLUSIONS: The nSOFA showed good-to-excellent discrimination of mortality among infants with EOS in the NICU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000533467

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeo, K. T., Goh, G. L., Park, W. Y., Wynn, J. L., & Aziz, K. B.
Affiliations
  • SingHealth (SG)
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Venue
Neonatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2023
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
796-800
ISSN
  • 1661-7800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-7819
OpenAlex
W4387116261
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neonatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM013979)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
early-onset sepsis, neonatal mortality, mortality prediction, organ dysfunction, neonatal intensive care, low birth weight infants, gestational age
MeSH terms
Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Retrospective Studies, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, Organ Dysfunction Scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review