Optimisation of lupus anticoagulant tests: should test samples always be mixed with normal plasma?
Abstract
Coagulation factor deficiencies are thought to interfere with the detection of the phospholipid-dependent coagulation inhibitor known as lupus anticoagulant (LA). Treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in particular, is thought to preclude accurate LA assessment. For this reason, the procedure to detect LA includes a mixing test, in which coagulation factor deficiencies are corrected by mixing samples with an equal volume of normal plasma. Despite these mixing tests, interpretation of LA test results is considered difficult in patients receiving high intensity VKA treatment. As a result, VKA treatment is often temporarily discontinued to allow LA assessment. However, whether coagulation factor deficiencies influence LA test results is unclear. We found that neither deficiency of a single coagulation factor, nor a functional coagulation factor deficiency due to high intensity VKA treatment, resulted in false positive dRVVT- or APTT-based (silica clotting time; SCT) LA test results. LA was readily detected in unmixed samples from VKA-treated LA-positive patients with both dRVVT and SCT reagents. VKA treatment caused an underestimation of the strength of the LA with SCT reagents, but did not lead to misclassification of LA status. Although mixing with normal plasma during both screen and confirm tests allowed more accurate assessment of the strength of the LA with SCT reagents in samples with an international normalised >2.5, the mixing procedure itself lead to misclassifica…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In situations where alternative or co-existing coagulation abnormalities are present, mixing tests can improve specificity of LA testing.
“However, in situations where alternative or co‐existing coagulation abnormalities are present, mixing tests can improve specificity of LA testing.34, 35, 36, 37”
Omitting the mixing test as suggested by Pennings et al is likely to increase the false positive rate significantly, as shown by the results presented here.
“Omitting the mixing test as suggested by Pennings et al (6) is likely to increase the false positive rate significantly as shown by the results presented here.”
From Mixing studies in lupus anticoagulant testing are required at least in some type of samples (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection
PENGO, V., TRIPODI, A., REBER, G., RAND, J. H., ORTEL, T. L., GALLI, M., & DE GROOT, P. G. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.x · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
Galli, M., Luciani, D., Bertolini, G., & Barbui, T. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-02-0441 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Ruffatti, A., Del Ross, T., Ciprian, M., Bertero, M. T., Salvatore, S., Scarpato, S., Montecucco, C., Rossi, S., Caramaschi, P., Biasi, D., et al. (2011) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2010.142042 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mixing studies in lupus anticoagulant testing are required at least in some type of samples
Devreese, K. M. J., & de Laat, B. (2015) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.13020 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Moore, G. W., Culhane, A. P., Daw, C. R., Noronha, C. P., & Kumano, O. (2016) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection
Moore, G. (2016) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib5040022 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kumano, O., & Moore, G. W. (2018) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1002/rth2.12069 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass
Molinari, A. C., Martini, T., Banov, L., Ierardi, A., Leotta, M., Strangio, A., & Santoro, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12206654 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Analytical dilemmas in lupus anticoagulant detection
Moore, G. W. (2023) · Exploration of Immunology · doi:10.37349/ei.2023.00104 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pennings, M., de Groot, P., Meijers, J., Huisman, A., Derksen, R., & Urbanus, R.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 736-742
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W1993111202
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Arthritis Foundation (10–1–307)
- Dutch Heart Foundation (2010T068)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, mixing test, vitamin K antagonists, coagulation factor deficiency, activated partial thromboplastin time, anticoagulation
- MeSH terms
- Blood Coagulation, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Factors, Blood Coagulation Tests, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Vitamin K, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, International Normalized Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review