Cited by 106Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with none or one additional risk factor of the CHA2DS2-VASc score: A comprehensive net clinical benefit analysis for warfarin, aspirin, or no therapy

Skjøth, Flemming, Nielsen, Peter, Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard, Lip, Gregory·2015·Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent stroke has to be balanced against the potential harm of serious bleeding, especially intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). We determined the net clinical benefit (NCB) balancing effectiveness and safety of no antithrombotic therapy, aspirin and warfarin in AF patients with none or one stroke risk factor. Using Danish registries, we determined NCB using various definitions intrinsic to our cohort (Danish weights at 1 and 5 year follow-up), with risk weights which were derived from the hazard ratio (HR) of death following an event, relative to HR of death after ischaemic stroke. When aspirin was compared to no treatment, NCB was neutral or negative for both risk strata. For warfarin vs no treatment, NCB using Danish weights was neutral where no risk factors were present and using five years follow-up. For one stroke risk factor, NCB was positive for warfarin vs no treatment, for one year and five year follow-up. For warfarin vs aspirin use in patients with no risk factors, NCB was positive with one year follow-up, but neutral with five year follow-up. With one risk factor, NCB was generally positive for warfarin vs aspirin. In conclusion, we show a positive overall advantage (i.e. positive NCB) of effective stroke prevention with OAC, compared to no therapy or aspirin with one additional stroke risk factor, using Danish weights. 'Low risk' AF patients with no additional stroke risk factors (i.e.CHA2DS2-VASc 0 in males, 1 in females) do not derive…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1160/th15-07-0565

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of stroke and thromboembolism vary considerably in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 or 2 due to differences in outcomes, populations, and anticoagulation status.

    “The rates of stroke and thromboembolism vary considerably in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores of 1 or 2 due to differences in outcomes, populations, and anticoagulation status (Web Addenda Table 1).371,376,377,1041”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skjøth, F., Nielsen, P., Larsen, T. B., & Lip, G.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Lip, Gregory
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2015
Volume
114
Issue
10
Pages
826-834
ISSN
  • 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2567-689X
OpenAlex
W2160740406
Cited by
106
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 4
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
non-valvular atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2-VASc score, oral anticoagulation, warfarin, aspirin, stroke prevention, intracranial hemorrhage, bleeding risk, net clinical benefit
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspirin, Atrial Fibrillation, Decision Support Techniques, Denmark, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Registries, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Warfarin, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review