Effects of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Lupus Anticoagulant Assays in a Real-Life Setting
Abstract
Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is based on prolongation in at least one coagulation assay (diluted Russell's viper venom time - dRVVT or activated partial thromboplastin time - aPTT), which normalises after addition of phospholipids. Both assays may be influenced by anticoagulants and therefore LA should not be tested during warfarin or heparin treatment. It has been shown (primarily in vitro) that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs - dabigatran [DAB], rivaroxaban [RIV] and apixaban [API]) may also influence LA testing. We tested the effects of DOACs on assays routinely used for the diagnosis of LA in patients treated with these drugs in a real-life setting. Plasma from patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DAB (n=30), RIV (n=20) and API (n=17) and not known to have LA were tested using dRVVT (LA-screen and LA-confirm, Life Diagnostics) and aPTT (PTT-LA, Diagnostica Stago and aPTT Actin FS, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) assays. According to the diagnostics algorithm, dRVVT and aPTT ratios of 1.4 positive, while if the ratios were 1.2-1.4 LA could not be ruled out. Plasma concentrations varied between 8-172 µg/l for DAB, 8-437 µg/l for RIV and 36-178 µg/l for API. LA diagnosis was negative in only eight (27 %) plasma samples from patients treated with DAB, and in five (25 %) and four samples (24 %) from patients treated with RIV and API, respectively. LA Positivity (dRVVT and aPTT ratios >1.4) was found in 5 cases (17 %) among patients treated with…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All DOACs prolong dRVVT in screening and confirmatory procedures, with rivaroxaban affecting screening more than confirmatory (increasing potential false positives) and opposite apixaban action (increasing potential false negatives).
“all DOACs prolong dRVVT in screening and confirmatory procedures, with rivaroxaban affecting screening more than confirmatory (increasing potential false positives) and opposite apixaban action (increasing potential false negatives) [73,74,75,76,77,78].”
From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
MIYAKIS, S., LOCKSHIN, M. D., ATSUMI, T., BRANCH, D. W., BREY, R. L., CERVERA, R., DERKSEN, R. H. W. M., DE GROOT, P. G., KOIKE, T., MERONI, P. L., et al. (2006) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x · Cited by 7,203 · see citing works
Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection
PENGO, V., TRIPODI, A., REBER, G., RAND, J. H., ORTEL, T. L., GALLI, M., & DE GROOT, P. G. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.x · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
Recent Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Detection of Lupus Anticoagulants
Moore, G. (2014) · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1364185 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Favresse, J., Lardinois, B., Sabor, L., Devalet, B., Vandepapeliere, J., Braibant, M., Lessire, S., Chatelain, B., Jacqmin, H., Douxfils, J., et al. (2018) · TH Open · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1657785 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Kumano, O., & Moore, G. W. (2019) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1002/rth2.12245 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Improvements in diagnosis and risk assessment of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome
Petri, M. (2019) · Hematology · doi:10.1182/hematology.2019000046 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass
Molinari, A. C., Martini, T., Banov, L., Ierardi, A., Leotta, M., Strangio, A., & Santoro, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12206654 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…can give both false-positive and false-negative results; all DOACs prolong dRVVT in screening and confirmatory procedures, with rivaroxaban affecting screening more than confirmatory (increasing potential false positives) and opposite apixaban action (increasing potential false negatives) [73–78].”
BackgroundAnalytical dilemmas in lupus anticoagulant detection
Moore, G. W. (2023) · Exploration of Immunology · doi:10.37349/ei.2023.00104 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Antovic, A., Norberg, E.-M., Berndtsson, M., Rasmuson, A., Malmström, R. E., Skeppholm, M., & Antovic, J.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 1700-1704
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2649415550
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, direct oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dilute Russell's viper venom time, activated partial thromboplastin time, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation
- MeSH terms
- Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Blood Coagulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Predictive Value of Tests, Prothrombin Time, Pyrazoles, Pyridones, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Drug Monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review