Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allelic Variants in Long-QT Disease Genes in Patients With Drug-Associated Torsades de Pointes

Yang, Ping, Kanki, Hideaki, Drolet, Benoit, Yang, Tao, Wei, Jian, Viswanathan, Prakash C., Hohnloser, Stefan H., Shimizu, Wataru, Schwartz, Peter J., Stanton, Marshall, Murray, Katherine T., Norris, Kris, George, Alfred L., Roden, Dan M.·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background — DNA variants appearing to predispose to drug-associated “acquired” long-QT syndrome (aLQTS) have been reported in congenital long-QT disease genes. However, the incidence of these genetic risk factors has not been systematically evaluated in a large set of patients with aLQTS. We have previously identified functionally important DNA variants in genes encoding K + channel ancillary subunits in 11% of an aLQTS cohort. Methods and Results — The coding regions of the genes encoding the pore-forming channel proteins KvLQT1, HERG, and SCN5A were screened in (1) the same aLQTS cohort (n=92) and (2) controls, drawn from patients tolerating QT-prolonging drugs (n=67) and cross sections of the Middle Tennessee (n=71) and US populations (n=90). The frequency of three common nonsynonymous coding region polymorphisms was no different between aLQTS and control subjects, as follows: 24% versus 19% for H558R (SCN5A), 3% versus 3% for R34C (SCN5A), and 14% versus 14% for K897T (HERG). Missense mutations (absent in controls) were identified in 5 of 92 patients. KvLQT1 and HERG mutations (one each) reduced K + currents in vitro, consistent with the idea that they augment risk for aLQTS. However, three SCN5A variants did not alter I Na , which argues that they played no role in the aLQTS phenotype. Conclusions — DNA variants in the coding regions of congenital long-QT disease genes predisposing to aLQTS can be identified in ≈10% to 15% of affected subjects, predominantly in genes encoding ancillary subunits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000014448.19052.4c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yang, P., Kanki, H., Drolet, B., Yang, T., Wei, J., Viswanathan, P. C., Hohnloser, S. H., Shimizu, W., Schwartz, P. J., Stanton, M., Murray, K. T., Norris, K., George, A. L., & Roden, D. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-04-23
Volume
105
Issue
16
Pages
1943-1948
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2127815448
Cited by
554
References
1
FWCI
26.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.