The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans
Open accessAbstract
Background — Experimental studies suggest that arterial injury and inflammation lead to increased neointimal growth after stenting. Despite the increased use of coronary stents in humans, there are only limited pathological data on the morphological features of in-stent restenosis. Methods and Results — Detailed histology was performed on 116 stents, implanted ≥90 days in 87 coronary arteries, from 56 patients (mean age, 59±13 years). The mean duration of stent implant was 10 months. In-stent restenosis was defined as a stent area stenosis of >75%. Lumen area increased as stent area increased ( r 2 =0.27, P =0.0001), but there was a much stronger correlation between stent area and neointimal area ( r 2 =0.70, P <0.0001). Arterial medial fracture was associated with a 29% increase ( P <0.01) in neointimal thickness compared with arteries with an intact media. Neointimal thickness ( P =0.0001), inflammatory cell density ( P <0.0001), and neointimal vascular channel density ( P <0.0001) were greater when struts were in contact with a ruptured arterial media compared with fibrous plaque or an intact fibrous cap. Stent strut penetration into a lipid core was associated with increased neointimal thickness ( P =0.04) and inflammatory cell density ( P =0.03). Neointimal inflammatory cell content was 2.4-fold greater in stents with restenosis versus no restenosis, and inflammation was associated with increased neoangiogenesis. Conclusions — Coronary stenting that is accompanied by medial damage or penetration of the stent into a lipid core induces increased arterial inflammation, which is associated with increased neointimal growth. These data suggest the use of stenting strategies that reduce inflammation and neoangiogenesis to reduce the incidence of restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathology of Drug-Eluting Stents in Humans
Joner, M., Finn, A. V., Farb, A., Mont, E. K., Kolodgie, F. D., Ladich, E., Kutys, R., Skorija, K., Gold, H. K., & Virmani, R. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042 · Cited by 2,744
Self-citationPathological Mechanisms of Fatal Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis in Humans
Farb, A., Burke, A. P., Kolodgie, F. D., & Virmani, R. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000091115.05480.b0 · Cited by 478
Self-citationLong-term surveillance of zinc implant in murine artery: Surprisingly steady biocorrosion rate
Drelich, A. J., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Drelich, J. W., & Goldman, J. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.045 · Cited by 188
Saeed, O., Otsuka, F., Polavarapu, R., Karmali, V., Weiss, D., Davis, T., Rostad, B., Pachura, K., Adams, L., Elliott, J., et al. (2012) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.111.240101 · Cited by 146
Self-citationGuler, N., Batyraliev, T., Dulger, H., Ozkara, C., Tuncer, M., Aslan, S., Okut, H., & Agirbasli, M. (2006) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.027 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Farb, A., Weber, D. K., Kolodgie, F. D., Burke, A. P., & Virmani, R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-06-25
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2974-2980
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2112961536
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000019071.72887.bd
- The paper
- Farb, A., Weber, D. K., Kolodgie, F. D., Burke, A. P., & Virmani, R. (2002). Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000019071.72887.bd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.