Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community

Avierinos, Jean-François, Gersh, Bernard J., Melton, L. Joseph, Bailey, Kent R., Shub, Clarence, Nishimura, Rick A., Tajik, A. Jamil, Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The outcome of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is controversial, with marked discrepancies in reported complication rates. Methods and Results— We conducted a community study of all Olmsted County, Minn, residents first diagnosed with asymptomatic MVP between 1989 and 1998 (N=833). Diagnosis, motivated by auscultatory findings (n=557) or incidental (n=276), was always confirmed by echocardiography with the use of current criteria. End points analyzed during 4581 person-years of follow-up were mortality (n=96, 19±2% at 10 years), cardiovascular morbidity (n=171), and MVP-related events (n=109, 20±2% at 10 years). The most frequent primary risk factors for cardiovascular mortality were mitral regurgitation from moderate to severe ( P =0.002, n=131) and, less frequently, ejection fraction <50% ( P =0.003, n=31). Secondary risk factors independently predictive of cardiovascular morbidity were slight mitral regurgitation, left atrium ≥40 mm, flail leaflet, atrial fibrillation, and age ≥50 years (all P <0.01). Patients with only 0 or 1 secondary risk factor (n=430) had excellent outcome, with 10-year mortality of 5±2% ( P =0.17 versus expected), cardiovascular morbidity of 0.5%/y, and MVP-related events of 0.2%/y. Patients with ≥2 secondary risk factors (n=250) had mortality similar to expected ( P =0.20) but high cardiovascular morbidity (6.2%/y, P <0.01) and notable MVP-related events (1.7%/y, P <0.01). Patients with primary risk factors (n=153) showed excess 10-year mortality (45±9%, P =0.01 versus expected), high morbidity (18.5%/y, P <0.01), and high MVP-related events (15%/y, P <0.01). Conclusions— Natural history of asymptomatic MVP in the community is widely heterogeneous and may be severe. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics allow separation of the majority of patients with excellent prognosis from subsets of patients displaying, during follow-up, high morbidity or even excess mortality as direct a consequence of MVP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000028933.34260.09

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Avierinos, J.-F., Gersh, B. J., Melton, L. J., Bailey, K. R., Shub, C., Nishimura, R. A., Tajik, A. J., & Enriquez-Sarano, M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-09-10
Volume
106
Issue
11
Pages
1355-1361
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2118953216
Cited by
448
References
31
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000028933.34260.09
The paper
Avierinos, J.-F., Gersh, B. J., Melton, L. J., Bailey, K. R., Shub, C., Nishimura, R. A., Tajik, A. J., & Enriquez-Sarano, M. (2002). Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000028933.34260.09

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.