The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sirolimus in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients Reduces Acute Rejection and Prevents Coronary Artery Disease at 2 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background— Sirolimus reduces acute rejection in renal transplant recipients and prevents vasculopathy in nonhuman primates and in-stent restenosis in humans. Its effects on rejection and transplant vasculopathy in human heart transplant recipients are unknown. Methods and Results— In a randomized, open-label study, sirolimus was compared with azathioprine in combination with cyclosporine and steroids administered from the time of cardiac transplantation. We report 6-month rejection rates (primary end point), 12-month safety and efficacy data, and 6- and 24-month graft vasculopathy data in 136 cardiac allograft recipients randomly assigned (2:1) to sirolimus (n=92) or azathioprine (n=44). At 6 months, the proportion of patients with grade 3a or greater acute rejection was 32.4% for sirolimus 3 mg/d ( P =0.027), 32.8% for sirolimus 5 mg/d ( P =0.013), and 56.8% for azathioprine. Patient survival at 12 months was comparable among groups. Intracoronary ultrasound at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years demonstrated highly significant progression of transplant vasculopathy in azathioprine-treated patients. At 6 months, a highly significant absence of progression in intimal plus medial proliferation and significant protection against luminal encroachment was evident in sirolimus-treated patients, and these effects were sustained at 2 years. Conclusions— Sirolimus use from the time of transplantation approximately halved the number of patients experiencing acute rejection. The measurable development of transplant vasculopathy at 6 months and 2 years in patients receiving azathioprine was not observed in patients receiving sirolimus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kavey, R.-E. W., Allada, V., Daniels, S. R., Hayman, L. L., McCrindle, B. W., Newburger, J. W., Parekh, R. S., & Steinberger, J. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.179568 · Cited by 707
Chambers, D. C., Perch, M., Zuckermann, A., Cherikh, W. S., Harhay, M. O., Hayes, D., Hsich, E., Khush, K. K., Potena, L., Sadavarte, A., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.021 · Cited by 596
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Recent Developments
Schmauss, D., & Weis, M. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.711911 · Cited by 587
Khush, K. K., Cherikh, W. S., Chambers, D. C., Goldfarb, S., Hayes, D., Kucheryavaya, A. Y., Levvey, B. J., Meiser, B., Rossano, J. W., & Stehlik, J. (2018) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.022 · Cited by 555
Kobashigawa, J. A., Miller, L. W., Russell, S. D., Ewald, G. A., Zucker, M. J., Goldberg, L. R., Eisen, H. J., Salm, K., Tolzman, D., Gao, J., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01290.x · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Keogh, A., Richardson, M., Ruygrok, P., Spratt, P., Galbraith, A., O’Driscoll, G., Macdonald, P., Esmore, D., Muller, D., & Faddy, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-10-26
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2694-2700
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2062643000
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sirolimus in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients Reduces Acute Rejection and Prevents Coronary Artery Disease at 2 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000136812.90177.94
- The paper
- Keogh, A., Richardson, M., Ruygrok, P., Spratt, P., Galbraith, A., O’Driscoll, G., Macdonald, P., Esmore, D., Muller, D., & Faddy, S. (2004). Sirolimus in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients Reduces Acute Rejection and Prevents Coronary Artery Disease at 2 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000136812.90177.94
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.