The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Mild Coronary Artery Disease and Endothelial Dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
Background —Coronary endothelial dysfunction is characterized by vasoconstrictive response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine. Although endothelial dysfunction is considered an early phase of coronary atherosclerosis, there is a paucity of information regarding the outcome of these patients. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the outcome of patients with mild coronary artery disease on the basis of their endothelial function. Methods and Results —Follow-up was obtained in 157 patients with mildly diseased coronary arteries who had undergone coronary vascular reactivity evaluation by graded administration of intracoronary acetylcholine, adenosine, and nitroglycerin and intracoronary ultrasound at the time of diagnostic study. Patients were divided on the basis of their response to acetylcholine into 3 groups: group 1 (n=83), patients with normal endothelial function; group 2 (n=32), patients with mild endothelial dysfunction; and group 3 (n=42), patients with severe endothelial dysfunction. Over an average 28-month follow-up (range, 11 to 52 months), none of the patients from group 1 or 2 had cardiac events. However, 6 (14%) with severe endothelial dysfunction had 10 cardiac events ( P <0.05 versus groups 1 and 2). Cardiac events included myocardial infarction, percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization, and/or cardiac death. Conclusions —Severe endothelial dysfunction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased cardiac events. This study supports the concept that coronary endothelial dysfunction may play a role in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia
Shepherd, J., Cobbe, S. M., Ford, I., Isles, C. G., Lorimer, A. R., Macfarlane, P. W., McKillop, J. H., & Packard, C. J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511163332001 · Cited by 7,449
Cited by
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., Jaffe, A. S., Jneid, H., Kelly, R. F., Kontos, M. C., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citationCirculating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk
Hill, J. M., Zalos, G., Halcox, J. P. J., Schenke, W. H., Waclawiw, M. A., Quyyumi, A. A., & Finkel, T. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022287 · Cited by 3,423
Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., Jaffe, A. S., Simoons, M. L., Chaitman, B. R., & White, H. D. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31826e1058 · Cited by 2,985
Endothelial Function and Dysfunction: Testing and Clinical Relevance
Deanfield, J. E., Halcox, J. P., & Rabelink, T. J. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.652859 · Cited by 2,710
Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Atherosclerosis
Davignon, J., & Ganz, P. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000131515.03336.f8 · Cited by 2,513
Metadata
- Authors
- Suwaidi, J. A., Hamasaki, S., Higano, S. T., Nishimura, R. A., Holmes, D. R., & Lerman, A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-03-07
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 948-954
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2145899271
- Cited by
- 2,043
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 82.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Mild Coronary Artery Disease and Endothelial Dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.9.948
- The paper
- Suwaidi, J. A., Hamasaki, S., Higano, S. T., Nishimura, R. A., Holmes, D. R., & Lerman, A. (2000). Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Mild Coronary Artery Disease and Endothelial Dysfunction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.9.948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.