The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure: Trends in Case Fatality in 66 547 Patients Hospitalized Between 1986 and 1995
Abstract
Background —Contemporary survival in unselected patients with heart failure and the population impact of newer therapies have not been widely studied. Therefore, we have documented case-fatality rates (CFRs) over a recent 10-year period. Methods and Results —In Scotland, all hospitalizations and deaths are captured on a single database. We have studied case fatality in all patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of heart failure from 1986 to 1995. A total of 66 547 patients (47% male) were studied. Median age was 72 years in men and 78 years in women. Crude CFRs at 30 days and at 1, 5, and 10 years were 19.9%, 44.5%, 76.5%, and 87.6%, respectively. Median survival was 1.47 years in men and 1.39 years in women (2.47 and 2.36 years, respectively, in those surviving 30 days). Age had a powerful effect on survival, and sex, comorbidity, and deprivation had modest effects. One-year CF was 24.2% in those aged <55 years and 58.1% in those aged >84 years. After adjustment, 30-day CFRs fell between 1986 and 1995, by 26% (95% CI 15 to 35, P <0.0001) in men and 17% (95% CI 6 to 26, P <0.0001) in women. Longer term CFRs fell by 18% (95% CI 13 to 24, P <0.0001) in men and 15% (95% CI 10 to 20, P <0.0001) in women. Median survival increased from 1.23 to 1.64 years. Conclusions —Heart failure CF is much higher in the general population than in clinical trials, especially in the elderly. Although survival has increased significantly over the last decade, there is still much room for improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SOLVD Investigators* (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108013250501 · Cited by 8,029
Cited by
Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure
Levy, D., Kenchaiah, S., Larson, M. G., Benjamin, E. J., Kupka, M. J., Ho, K. K. L., Murabito, J. M., & Vasan, R. S. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020265 · Cited by 2,152
Clinical epidemiology of heart failure
Mosterd, A., & Hoes, A. W. (2007) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.025270 · Cited by 1,922
Roger, V. L. (2013) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.113.300268 · Cited by 1,728
More ‘Malignant’ Than Cancer? Five-Year Survival Following a First Admission for Heart Failure
Stewart, S., MacIntyre, K., Hole, D. J., Capewell, S., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2001) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00141-0 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationCost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK
Stewart, S., Murphy, N., Walker, A., McGuire, A., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2004) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2002.008748 · Cited by 590
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MacIntyre, K., Capewell, S., Stewart, S., Chalmers, J. W. T., Boyd, J., Finlayson, A., Redpath, A., Pell, J. P., & McMurray, J. J. V.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-09-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1126-1131
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2165735403
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure: Trends in Case Fatality in 66 547 Patients Hospitalized Between 1986 and 1995. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1126
- The paper
- MacIntyre, K., Capewell, S., Stewart, S., Chalmers, J. W. T., Boyd, J., Finlayson, A., Redpath, A., Pell, J. P., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2000). Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure: Trends in Case Fatality in 66 547 Patients Hospitalized Between 1986 and 1995. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.