Cited by 590Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK

Open access
Stewart, S, Murphy, N, Walker, A, McGuire, A, McMurray, J J V·2004·Heart

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost of atrial fibrillation (AF) to health and social services in the UK in 1995 and, based on epidemiological trends, to project this estimate to 2000. Design, setting, and main outcome measures: Contemporary estimates of health care activity related to AF were applied to the whole population of the UK on an age and sex specific basis for the year 1995. The activities considered (and costs calculated) were hospital admissions, outpatient consultations, general practice consultations, and drug treatment (including the cost of monitoring anticoagulant treatment). By adjusting for the progressive aging of the British population and related increases in hospital admissions, the cost of AF was also projected to the year 2000. Results: There were 534 000 people with AF in the UK during 1995. The “direct” cost of health care for these patients was £244 million (~€350 million) or 0.62% of total National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Hospitalisations and drug prescriptions accounted for 50% and 20% of this expenditure, respectively. Long term nursing home care after hospital admission cost an additional £46.4 million (~€66 million). The direct cost of AF rose to £459 million (~€655 million) in 2000, equivalent to 0.97% of total NHS expenditure based on 1995 figures. Nursing home costs rose to £111 million (~€160 million). Conclusions: AF is an extremely costly public health problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.2002.008748

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atrial fibrillation is known to have a significant impact on health care costs, with the major cost-drivers being hospitalizations, stroke, and loss of productivity.

    “AF is known to have a significant impact on health care costs, with the major cost-drivers being hospitalizations, stroke, and loss of productivity.6, 27, 28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Stewart, Murphy, Walker, et al www.heartjnl.com on 5 April 2019 by BMJJournals Maint User. Protected by copyright. http://heart.bmj.com/ Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.2002.008748 on 13 February 2004. Downloaded from on July 6, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://heart.bmj.com/ Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.2002.008748 on 13 February 2004. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. Stewart S, Jenkins A, Buchan S, et al. The current cost of heart failure in the UK: an economic analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;4:361-71.
  3. Carrol K, Majeed A. Trends in mortality and hospital admissions associated with atrial fibrillation in England and Wales. Health Stat Quart 2001;9:37-44.
  4. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Boyd J, et al. Trends in first-ever admissions for atrial fibrillation in Scotland: 1985-1995. Int J Cardiol 2002;82:229-36.
  5. Laing W. The cost of diet related disease. In: Turner M, ed. Preventative Nutrition Society. London: Academic Press, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, S., Murphy, N., Walker, A., McGuire, A., & McMurray, J. J. V.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
McMurray, J J V
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-02-13
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
286-292
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2164238702
Cited by
590
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 47
FWCI
19.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, economic burden, health care costs, hospitalization, anticoagulation, nursing home care, cost projections, population aging, outpatient visits, drug prescribing
MeSH terms
Aged, Ambulatory Care, Atrial Fibrillation, Community Health Services, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Expenditures, Family Practice, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitalization, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Drug Prescriptions, Referral and Consultation, Program Evaluation, Cost of Illness, Hospital Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review