Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethrombosis after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of residual lesions.

Harrison, D G, Ferguson, D W, Collins, S M, Skorton, D J, Ericksen, E E, Kioschos, J M, Marcus, M L, White, C W·1984·Circulation

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that lesion rethrombosis after streptokinase reperfusion is related to luminal size of the residual stenosis. Two independent techniques of analyzing coronary angiograms, quantitative coronary angiography and computer-based videodensitometry, were used to estimate the size of the residual lumen immediately after discontinuation of streptokinase. These techniques were selected because they provide independent estimates of cross-sectional area of a lesion with high degrees of reproducibility and minimal observer variability. Twenty-four patients who had undergone successful reperfusion with streptokinase were studied. Seven patients had lesion rethrombosis documented either on a repeat angiogram, at autopsy, or, in one case, by the fact that the patient had an acute transmural infarction resulting in death. Vessel patency was documented by repeat coronary angiography 8 to 14 days after initial streptokinase reperfusion in the other 17 patients. As assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, seven of 13 patients (54%) with minimal luminal cross-sectional areas of less than 0.4 mm2 had rethrombosis. None of the 11 patients with lumens greater than 0.4 mm2 had rethrombosis. In the 17 patients with vessels that remained patent the size of the residual lesion at repeat catheterization was compared with its size immediately after reperfusion with streptokinase. Over the intervening 8 to 14 day interval, an average percentage increase in minimal cross-sectional area of 116 +/- 34% was observed. In seven patients minimal luminal cross-sectional area more than doubled. Integrated optical density, an index of the severity of coronary stenosis derived from computer-based videodensitometry, was also useful in identifying a subgroup of patients at high risk for rethrombosis of lesion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.69.5.991

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, D. G., Ferguson, D. W., Collins, S. M., Skorton, D. J., Ericksen, E. E., Kioschos, J. M., Marcus, M. L., & White, C. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1984-05
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
991-999
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2015417339
Cited by
321
References
7
FWCI
47.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethrombosis after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of residual lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.69.5.991
The paper
Harrison, D. G., Ferguson, D. W., Collins, S. M., Skorton, D. J., Ericksen, E. E., Kioschos, J. M., Marcus, M. L., & White, C. W. (1984). Rethrombosis after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of residual lesions. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.69.5.991

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.