Cited by 44Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

SINGLE‐UNIT SYMPATHETIC DISCHARGE PATTERN IN PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ELEVATED CARDIOVASCULAR RISK

Lambert, Elisabeth, Dawood, Tye, Schlaich, Markus, Straznicky, Nora, Esler, Murray, Lambert, Gavin·2008·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Although measuring the rate of firing of multi‐unit muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) has provided important information in many aspects of cardiovascular medicine, measuring single‐unit vasoconstrictor activity provides a better understanding of the possible mechanisms underlying disturbed sympathetic nervous system activity. Detailed firing patterns of sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurons have been recorded in conditions associated with sympathoexcitation such as heart failure, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, hypertension and obesity; conditions in which cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are demonstrably elevated. Moreover, in conditions such as anxiety disorders and depression, in which elevated cardiovascular risk has recently been established, single‐unit analysis has highlighted a disturbed sympathetic firing pattern, which could not be identified on multi‐unit MSNA recording. This disturbed sympathetic nerve firing pattern, characterized by increased incidence of multiple firing within a sympathetic burst, has deleterious consequences on the cardiovascular system. Single‐unit methodology may represent a major step forward in the understanding of the link between disturbed sympathetic nerve firing and associated cardiovascular risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04905.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the coexistence of impaired norepinephrine reuptake with firing salvos in normal-weight essential hypertension and in depressive illness and panic disorder, there is evidence of cardiac risk, even in panic disorder.

    “Conversely, with the coexistence of impaired norepinephrine reuptake with firing salvos in normal-weight essential hypertension 31,[33][34][35][36] and in depressive illness 42,51,79 and panic disorder, 51,79,80 there is evidence of cardiac risk, 84 even in panic disorder.[85][86][87]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, E., Dawood, T., Schlaich, M., Straznicky, N., Esler, M., & Lambert, G.
Affiliations
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-27
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
503-507
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W2111020812
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
sympathoexcitation, cardiovascular risk, heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, obesity, anxiety disorders, depression
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart, Humans, Risk Factors, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review