Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of alteration in preload on the pattern of left ventricular diastolic filling as assessed by Doppler echocardiography in humans.

Stoddard, M F, Pearson, A C, Kern, M J, Ratcliff, J, Mrosek, D G, Labovitz, A J·1989·Circulation

Abstract

We examined the influence of alterations in preload on pulsed Doppler indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in 50 patients including 12 without cardiovascular disease, 29 with coronary artery disease, and nine with critical aortic stenosis. Micromanometer left ventricular pressure was recorded simultaneously with pulsed Doppler echocardiography of left ventricular inflow and M-mode echocardiography of left ventricular diameter. Chamber stiffness constants, kd and kv, were obtained from the diastolic pressure-diameter and pressure-volume relations, respectively. Relaxation was measured by the isovolumic relaxation time constants, TL and TD, derived from the exponential left ventricular pressure decay and maximum negative dP/dt. In 41 patients after nitroglycerin treatment, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure decreased from 18 +/- 5 to 13 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). The ratio of peak early to peak atrial filling velocities and time-velocity integral ratios decreased from 1.08 +/- 0.57 to 0.90 +/- 0.42 (p less than 0.001) and from 1.77 +/- 0.95 to 1.41 +/- 0.71 (p less than 0.001), respectively. The peak early filling velocity and time-velocity integral decreased from 56.1 +/- 15.7 to 49.9 +/- 14.5 cm/sec (p less than 0.001) and from 7.9 +/- 2.7 to 6.8 +/- 2.8 cm (p less than 0.001), respectively. Relaxation (TL, TD, and maximum negative dP/dt) and chamber stiffness (kd and kv) were not impaired after nitroglycerin administration. In 48 patients after ventriculography, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased from 18 +/- 6 to 22 +/- 8 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). The peak early and peak atrial filling velocities increased from 57.4 +/- 15.2 to 68.3 +/- 19.7 cm/sec (p less than 0.001) and from 61.0 +/- 22.7 to 69.4 +/- 23.2 cm/sec (p less than 0.01), respectively. As a result, the ratio of peak early to peak atrial filling velocity was unchanged. However, in the aortic stenosis group, the ratio of peak early to peak atrial filling velocity increased from 0.95 +/- 0.64 to 1.10 +/- 0.72 (p less than 0.02). Relaxation and chamber stiffness were unchanged. Thus, a reduction or increase in preload may induce a diastolic filling pattern that mimics or masks diastolic dysfunction, respectively. Preload conditions need to be accounted for when the status of diastolic function is extrapolated from the pulsed Doppler mitral inflow velocity profile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.79.6.1226

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stoddard, M. F., Pearson, A. C., Kern, M. J., Ratcliff, J., Mrosek, D. G., & Labovitz, A. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1989-06
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
1226-1236
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2093501112
Cited by
352
References
0
FWCI
22.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.