The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction. Comparison with 4,315 men.
Open accessAbstract
We determined in-hospital and 1-year prognoses after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in 5,839 consecutive patients derived from 14 of 21 coronary care units in Israel during 1981-1983. Age-adjusted in-hospital mortality was 23.1% in 1,524 women and 15.7% in 4,315 men (p less than 0.0005). One-year age-adjusted mortality rates in patients surviving hospitalization were 11.8% in women and 9.3% in men (p = 0.03). Cumulative age-adjusted 1-year mortality rates were 31.8% in women and 23.1% in men (p less than 0.0005). Relative odds of mortality, covariate-adjusted for major prognostic factors that included age, prior MI, congestive heart failure, and infarct location by electrocardiogram, indicated that female gender was independently and significantly associated with increased mortality both during hospitalization (relative odds, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.04) and at 1 year after discharge (relative odds, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.66). In separate multivariate analyses for each gender, a major factor that emerged as a predictor of outcome in women, but not in men, was a reported history of diabetes mellitus, both for in-hospital mortality and for 1-year mortality. However, even in the nondiabetics in this population, female gender was a significant, independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. The findings of the present study substantiate that women fare worse than men after suffering an acute MI, that increased age does not fully account for the increased mortality in women, and that diabetic women are at particularly high risk once MI has occurred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease
Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107253250401 · Cited by 1,188
Cardiovascular Health and Disease in Women
Wenger, N. K., Speroff, L., & Packard, B. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199307223290406 · Cited by 801
Sex-Related Differences in Autonomic Modulation of Heart Rate in Middle-aged Subjects
Huikuri, H. V., Pikkuja¨msa¨, S. M., Airaksinen, K. E. J., Ika¨heimo, M. J., Rantala, A. O., Kauma, H., Lilja, M., & Kesa¨niemi, Y. A. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.2.122 · Cited by 447
Shaw, L. J., Bairey Merz, C. N., Azziz, R., Stanczyk, F. Z., Sopko, G., Braunstein, G. D., Kelsey, S. F., Kip, K. E., Cooper-DeHoff, R. M., Johnson, B. D., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0425 · Cited by 427
RetractedAdes, P. A., Waldmann, M. L., Polk, D. M., & Coflesky, J. T. (1992) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90894-5 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenland, P., Reicher-Reiss, H., Goldbourt, U., & Behar, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 484-491
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2072433251
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction. Comparison with 4,315 men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.83.2.484
- The paper
- Greenland, P., Reicher-Reiss, H., Goldbourt, U., & Behar, S. (1991). In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction. Comparison with 4,315 men. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.2.484
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.