Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prodromal Angina Limits Infarct Size: A Role for Ischemic Preconditioning

Ottani, Filippo, Galvani, Marcello, Ferrini, Donatella, Sorbello, Francesco, Limonetti, Patrizia, Pantoli, Denis, Rusticali, Franco·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background In the experimental setting, it has been demonstrated that preconditioning myocardium before prolonged occlusion with brief ischemic episodes affords substantial protection to the cells by delaying lethal injury, thereby limiting infarct size. Whether the same occurs in humans remains unknown. Methods and Results This study was undertaken to determine whether new-onset prodromal angina, defined as chest pain episodes limited to the 24 hours before myocardial infarction, is the clinical correlate of the ischemic preconditioning phenomenon. Twenty-five patients with their first anterior myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [r-TPA], 100 mg/3 hours) were retrospectively included in the study because they met the following criteria: (1) <120 minutes from onset of symptoms to reperfusion therapy, (2) <90 minutes from the beginning of thrombolytic therapy to reperfusion (defined as rapid ST elevation reduction >50%), (3) a patent infarct-related coronary artery with TIMI 3 flow and complete absence of collateral circulation to the infarct related artery (assessed at 24±5 days), and (4) the presence of new-onset prodromal angina, ie, typical chest pain episodes occurring at rest within 24 hours or, alternatively, a complete absence of symptoms before onset of infarction. Therefore, on the basis of their clinical status before infarction, the patients were divided into two groups: group 1, 13 patients without prodromal angina, and group 2, 12 patients with prodromal angina. Despite no difference in time to treatment (81±19 versus 75±21 minutes in group 1 and group 2, respectively; P =NS) and time to reperfusion (58±34 versus 46±24 minutes; P =NS), the peak of CKMB release was markedly lower in group 2 (86.3±66 versus 192.3±108.3 IU/L; P <.01). In addition, although both groups were comparable in terms of area at risk (amount of myocardium beyond the infarct-related stenosis; 15.1±4.6 versus 13.7±4.6 hypokinetic segments in group 1 and group 2, respectively, P =NS), the final infarct size (11±7.5 versus 5.6±4 hypokinetic segments, P <.04) was smaller in group 2. Thus, the limitation of the infarct size was significantly greater in group 2 (69% versus 36%; P <.05), and this represents an additional 33% reduction (95% confidence intervals, 7.1% to 58.9%; P =.01) in the group of patients with prodromal angina. Also, the third index, that is, the ECG, showed a favorable trend toward a lesser number of Q waves and a higher Σ R waves, although the values did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Despite a similar area at risk, patients with new-onset prodromal angina showed a significantly smaller infarct size compared with patients without prodromal symptoms. Since the two groups had similar times to reperfusion and no evidence of collateral circulation to the infarct related artery, the protection afforded by angina in group 2 patients might be explained by the occurrence of ischemic preconditioning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.91.2.291

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Ottani, F., Galvani, M., Ferrini, D., Sorbello, F., Limonetti, P., Pantoli, D., & Rusticali, F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-01-15
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
291-297
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2079378968
Cited by
408
References
12
FWCI
22.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prodromal Angina Limits Infarct Size: A Role for Ischemic Preconditioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.2.291
The paper
Ottani, F., Galvani, M., Ferrini, D., Sorbello, F., Limonetti, P., Pantoli, D., & Rusticali, F. (1995). Prodromal Angina Limits Infarct Size: A Role for Ischemic Preconditioning. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.2.291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.