Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrophysiological Effects of Catheter Ablation of Inferior Vena Cava–Tricuspid Annulus Isthmus in Common Atrial Flutter

Cauchemez, Bruno, Haissaguerre, Michel, Fischer, Bruno, Thomas, Olivier, Clementy, Jacques, Coumel, Philippe·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background The electrophysiological mechanisms for successful catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFl) targeting the inferior vena cava–tricuspid annulus (IVC-TA) isthmus have not been determined. Methods and Results Twenty patients with common AFl were studied. All had inducible common AFl, and 8 of them had both common and reverse AFl. Right atrial (RA) activation sequences were investigated during pacing from sites proximal (low lateral RA) and distal (proximal coronary sinus) to the IVC-TA isthmus both during entrainment of common or reverse AFl and during pacing in sinus rhythm. This was repeated after ablation. During pacing in sinus rhythm from the low lateral RA, the septum was activated by caudocranial and craniocaudal wave fronts. Similarly, during pacing from the proximal coronary sinus, the lateral RA was activated by two wave fronts. Catheter ablation of the IVC-TA isthmus induced dramatic changes in mapping due to the loss of caudocranial wave front in all but 1 patient. The septum and the lateral RA were activated by a single craniocaudal front as during entrainment of reverse or common AFl, respectively. After a follow-up of 8±2 months, common or reverse AFl occurred in 4 patients. Two had no or only unidirectional changes in the isthmus conduction induced by ablation. The other 2 had a late recovery of conduction. Conclusions The present study provides evidence that the mechanism of successful AFl ablation targeting the IVC-TA isthmus is local bidirectional conduction block. This change can be used as a new and complementary electrophysiological end point for the procedure. AFl recurrences are associated with failure to achieve a permanent block.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.93.2.284

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Cauchemez, B., Haissaguerre, M., Fischer, B., Thomas, O., Clementy, J., & Coumel, P.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-01-15
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
284-294
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2081097647
Cited by
312
References
1
FWCI
23.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological Effects of Catheter Ablation of Inferior Vena Cava–Tricuspid Annulus Isthmus in Common Atrial Flutter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.2.284
The paper
Cauchemez, B., Haissaguerre, M., Fischer, B., Thomas, O., Clementy, J., & Coumel, P. (1996). Electrophysiological Effects of Catheter Ablation of Inferior Vena Cava–Tricuspid Annulus Isthmus in Common Atrial Flutter. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.2.284

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.