Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adventitial Remodeling After Coronary Arterial Injury

Shi, Yi, Pieniek, Marc, Fard, Ali, O’Brien, James, Mannion, John D., Zalewski, Andrew·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Intraluminal thrombus formation and medial smooth muscle (SM) cell proliferation are recognized responses of the arterial system to injury. In contrast to these well-characterized processes during vascular repair, changes involving the adventitia have been largely neglected in previous studies. Hence, the goal of this investigation was to assess the response of the adventitia to coronary arterial injury. Methods and Results Adventitial changes in porcine coronary arteries subjected to medial injury were characterized by immunohistochemistry, histochemistry, and microscopic morphometry. The rapid development of a hypercellular response in the adventitia was evident 3 days after balloon-induced medial injury. Cell proliferation, as assessed by proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining, reached the maximum level in the adventitia at 3 days, whereas at 14 and 28 days, the number of replicating cells reverted toward the baseline. The proliferating activity in the adventitia exceeded that seen in the media at all times after injury. To further define the changes in the phenotype of adventitial cells, the expression of three cytoskeletal proteins (vimentin, α-SM actin, and desmin) was characterized. Fibroblasts in normal adventitia expressed vimentin but no α-SM actin or desmin. After injury, these cells acquired characteristics of myofibroblasts expressing α-SM actin, which peaked at 7 and 14 days. Desmin expression was patchy in the adventitia, as opposed to its homogeneous distribution in medial SM cells. The modulation of fibroblast phenotype was transient, inasmuch as α-SM actin immunostaining declined at 28 days after injury, when dense, collagen-rich scar was evident within the adventitia. The above-described changes involving hypercellularity of the adventitia, myofibroblast formation, and fibrosis were associated with a significant focal adventitial thickening at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after injury ( P <.01 versus uninjured coronary arteries). Conclusions This study demonstrates the involvement of the adventitia in the vascular repair process after medial injury. The hypercellularity of the adventitial layer, proliferation of fibroblasts, and modulation of their phenotype to myofibroblasts are associated with the development of the thickened adventitia. It is postulated that these phenomena affect vascular remodeling and may provide an important insight into the mechanisms of vascular disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.93.2.340

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Shi, Y., Pieniek, M., Fard, A., O’Brien, J., Mannion, J. D., & Zalewski, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-01-15
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
340-348
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2017451104
Cited by
340
References
35
FWCI
41.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adventitial Remodeling After Coronary Arterial Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.2.340
The paper
Shi, Y., Pieniek, M., Fard, A., O’Brien, J., Mannion, J. D., & Zalewski, A. (1996). Adventitial Remodeling After Coronary Arterial Injury. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.2.340

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.