Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrafast Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Modality in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Study

Budoff, Matthew J., Georgiou, Demetrios, Brody, Alan, Agatston, Arthur S., Kennedy, John, Wolfkiel, Christopher, Stanford, William, Shields, Paul, Lewis, Roger J., Janowitz, Warren R., Rich, Stuart, Brundage, Bruce H.·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Ultrafast computed tomography (CT), by acquiring images of the proximal coronary arteries, detects coronary calcifications and has been demonstrated to be highly sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in many small studies. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between ultrafast CT scanning and coronary angiography in a large number of symptomatic patients. Methods and Results The study population consisted of 710 patients from six participating centers. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the individual contributions of age, number of calcified vessels, and the calcium score for the probability of angiographically significant disease. Of the 710 patients enrolled, 427 patients had significant angiographic disease, and coronary calcification was detected in 404, yielding a sensitivity of 95%. Of the 23 patients without calcifications, 19 (83%) had single-vessel disease at angiography. Of the 283 patients without angiographically significant disease, 124 had negative ultrafast CT coronary studies, for a specificity of 44%. An increasing number of vessels with calcification present on ultrafast CT was found to increase specificity for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease in at least one vessel ( P <.0001). As the log of the calcium score increases, the probability of multivessel obstructive disease increases ( P <.0001). Conclusions Ultrafast CT scanning is a noninvasive, non–exercise-dependent test with an excellent sensitivity for the detection of coronary artery disease. The presence of calcifications in multiple vessels and in younger populations correlates with higher specificities for obstructive disease, making ultrafast CT coronary scanning a very useful diagnostic test.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.898

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Budoff, M. J., Georgiou, D., Brody, A., Agatston, A. S., Kennedy, J., Wolfkiel, C., Stanford, W., Shields, P., Lewis, R. J., Janowitz, W. R., Rich, S., & Brundage, B. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-03
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
898-904
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1976949192
Cited by
488
References
2
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafast Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Modality in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.5.898
The paper
Budoff, M. J., Georgiou, D., Brody, A., Agatston, A. S., Kennedy, J., Wolfkiel, C., Stanford, W., Shields, P., Lewis, R. J., Janowitz, W. R., Rich, S., & Brundage, B. H. (1996). Ultrafast Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Modality in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.5.898

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.