Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association Between Intima-Media Thickness and Wall Shear Stress in Common Carotid Arteries in Healthy Male Subjects

Gnasso, Agostino, Carallo, Claudio, Irace, Concetta, Spagnuolo, Vitaliano, De Novara, Giuseppina, Mattioli, Pier Luigi, Pujia, Arturo·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Atherosclerotic lesions lie in regions of low wall shear stress. No relationship between wall shear stress and intima-media thickness in vivo has been reported. Aims of the present study were to verify the reproducibility of wall shear stress measurement in vivo and to evaluate its association with intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery in healthy subjects. Methods and Results Wall shear stress was calculated according to the following formula: Shear Stress=Blood Viscosity×Blood Velocity/Internal Diameter. Blood viscosity was measured by use of a cone/plate viscometer. Blood velocity, internal diameter, and intima-media thickness were measured by high-resolution echo Doppler. Twenty-one healthy male subjects were investigated. Peak and mean shear stress values were 29.5±8.2 and 12.1±3.1 dynes/cm −2 (mean±SD), respectively. Peak shear stress was inversely related to intima-media thickness ( r =.62), age ( r =.77), systolic blood pressure ( r =.61), and body mass index ( r =.59) ( P <.0001 for all coefficients). Mean shear stress yielded similar results. The relationship between shear stress and intima-media thickness was independent of age, blood pressure, and body mass index. The reproducibility, calculated by Kendall's W test, was statistically significant. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that common carotid artery wall shear stress measurement in vivo is reproducible. It inversely relates to intima-media thickness, age, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. These findings confirm in vivo the role of shear stress in intima-media thickening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3257

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Gnasso, A., Carallo, C., Irace, C., Spagnuolo, V., De Novara, G., Mattioli, P. L., & Pujia, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-12-15
Volume
94
Issue
12
Pages
3257-3262
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2101375531
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Intima-Media Thickness and Wall Shear Stress in Common Carotid Arteries in Healthy Male Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3257
The paper
Gnasso, A., Carallo, C., Irace, C., Spagnuolo, V., De Novara, G., Mattioli, P. L., & Pujia, A. (1996). Association Between Intima-Media Thickness and Wall Shear Stress in Common Carotid Arteries in Healthy Male Subjects. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.