The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell-Derived Microparticles Generated in Patients During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Highly Procoagulant
Open accessAbstract
Background Microparticles from platelets and other cells have been extensively studied and characterized in vitro. Although the level of platelet-derived microparticles is elevated in a variety of diseases, including cardiac surgery, virtually nothing is known about their functions in vivo. The aim of the present study was to investigate the procoagulant properties of microparticles generated in vivo. Methods and Results In 6 patients at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, 14.8×10 9 /L (median; range, 9.7 to 27.4×10 9 /L) platelet-derived microparticles were present in pericardial blood, whereas blood obtained from the systemic circulation contained 1.6×10 9 /L (median; range, 0.4 to 8.9×10 9 /L) of such microparticles, as determined by flow cytometry. Microparticles stained positively for phosphatidylserine as determined with labeled annexin V. In contrast to systemic blood, pericardial blood contained not only microparticles of platelet origin but also microparticles that originated from erythrocytes, monocytes, or granulocytes, and other hitherto unknown cellular sources. Plasma prepared from pericardial blood and to a lesser extent plasma from systemic blood obtained at the same time, stimulated formation of thrombin in vitro. This activity of pericardial plasma was lost after removal of its microparticles by high-speed centrifugation, whereas the corresponding microparticle pellet was strongly procoagulant. The generation of thrombin in vitro involved a tissue factor/factor VII–dependent and factor XII–independent pathway. Conclusions This study is the first to demonstrate that microparticles generated in vivo can stimulate coagulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular Interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles
Colombo, M., Raposo, G., & Théry, C. (2014) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326 · Cited by 6,186
Classification, Functions, and Clinical Relevance of Extracellular Vesicles
van der Pol, E., Böing, A. N., Harrison, P., Sturk, A., & Nieuwland, R. (2012) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.005983 · Cited by 1,754
Self-citationGorbet, M. B., & Sefton, M. V. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.023 · Cited by 1,347
Exosomes and Ectosomes in Intercellular Communication
Meldolesi, J. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.059 · Cited by 944
Combes, V., Simon, A.-C., Grau, G.-E., Arnoux, D., Camoin, L., Sabatier, F., Mutin, M., Sanmarco, M., Sampol, J., & Dignat-George, F. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci4985 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Nieuwland, R., Berckmans, R. J., Rotteveel-Eijkman, R. C., Maquelin, K. N., Roozendaal, K. J., Jansen, P. G. M., Have, K. T., Eijsman, L., Hack, C. E., & Sturk, A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1997-11-18
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3534-3541
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2165683921
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-Derived Microparticles Generated in Patients During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Highly Procoagulant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3534
- The paper
- Nieuwland, R., Berckmans, R. J., Rotteveel-Eijkman, R. C., Maquelin, K. N., Roozendaal, K. J., Jansen, P. G. M., Have, K. T., Eijsman, L., Hack, C. E., & Sturk, A. (1997). Cell-Derived Microparticles Generated in Patients During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Highly Procoagulant. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.