Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beat-to-Beat QT Interval Variability: Novel Evidence for Repolarization Lability in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Berger, Ronald D., Kasper, Edward K., Baughman, Kenneth L., Marban, Eduardo, Calkins, Hugh, Tomaselli, Gordon F.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is associated with a high incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Abnormalities in repolarization of ventricular myocardium have been implicated in the development of these arrhythmias. Spatial heterogeneity in repolarization has been studied in DCM, but temporal fluctuations in repolarization in this setting have been largely ignored. We sought to test the hypothesis that beat-to-beat QT interval variability is increased in DCM patients compared with control subjects. Methods and Results Eighty-three patients with ischemic and nonischemic DCM and 60 control subjects served as the study population. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability was measured by automated analysis on the basis of 256-second records of the surface ECG. A QT variability index (QTVI) was calculated for each subject as the logarithm of the ratio of normalized QT variance to heart rate variance. The coherence between heart rate and QT interval fluctuations was determined by spectral analysis. In patients, ejection fractions were assessed by echocardiography or ventriculography, and spatial QT dispersion was determined from the standard 12-lead ECG. DCM patients had greater QT variance than control subjects (60.4±63.1 versus 25.7±24.8 ms 2 , P <.0001) despite reduced heart rate variance (6.7±7.8 versus 10.5±10.4 bpm 2 , P =.01). The QTVI was higher in DCM patients than in control subjects, with a high degree of significance (−0.43±0.71 versus −1.29±0.51, P <10 −12 ). QTVI did not correlate with ejection fraction or spatial QT dispersion but did depend on New York Heart Association functional class. QTVI did not differ between DCM patients with ischemic and those with nonischemic origin. Coherence between heart rate and QT interval fluctuations at physiological frequencies was lower in DCM patients compared with control subjects (0.28±0.14 versus 0.39±0.18, P <.0001). Conclusions DCM is associated with beat-to-beat fluctuations in QT interval that are larger than normal and uncoupled from variations in heart rate. QT interval variability increases with worsening functional class but is independent of ejection fraction. These data indicate that DCM leads to temporal lability in ventricular repolarization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1557

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1161/circ.72.4.2863012 · doi:10.1161/circ.72.4.2863012
  2. 10.1161/circ.90.5.7955213 · doi:10.1161/circ.90.5.7955213
  3. 10.1161/res.47.3.6447553 · doi:10.1161/res.47.3.6447553
  4. 10.1161/res.61.1.3608112 · doi:10.1161/res.61.1.3608112
  5. 10.1161/circ.85.3.1311223 · doi:10.1161/circ.85.3.1311223
  6. 10.1161/circ.60.4.476879 · doi:10.1161/circ.60.4.476879
  7. 10.1161/res.73.2.8330380 · doi:10.1161/res.73.2.8330380
  8. 10.1161/res.73.2.8330381 · doi:10.1161/res.73.2.8330381
  9. 10.1161/res.9.1.165 · doi:10.1161/res.9.1.165
  10. Elharrar V, Atarashi H, Surawicz B. Cycle length-dependent action potential duration in canine cardiac Purkinje fibers. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:H936-H945.
  11. 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013675 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013675
  12. 10.1093/cvr/16.10.547 · doi:10.1093/cvr/16.10.547
  13. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1992.tb00991.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1992.tb00991.x
  14. Algra A, Le Brun H, Zeelenberg C. An algorithm for computer measurement of QT intervals in the 24 hour ECG. Comput Cardiol. 1987;13:117-119.
  15. Critelli G, Marciano F, Mazzarella M, Migaux ML. QT interval measurements of long-term ECG recordings: application of an automatic Holter analysis system. Comput Cardiol. 1982;8:481-484.
  16. Pisani E, Pellegrini F, Ansuini G, Di Noto G, Rimatori C, Russo P. Performance evaluation of algorithms for QT interval measurements in ambulatory ECG recordings. Comput Cardiol. 1985;11:459-462.
  17. 10.1161/circ.85.5.1572038 · doi:10.1161/circ.85.5.1572038
  18. 10.1161/circ.77.1.3335062 · doi:10.1161/circ.77.1.3335062
  19. 10.1161/circ.74.4.3757186 · doi:10.1161/circ.74.4.3757186
  20. 10.1161/circ.67.6.6851031 · doi:10.1161/circ.67.6.6851031

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
Berger, R. D., Kasper, E. K., Baughman, K. L., Marban, E., Calkins, H., & Tomaselli, G. F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-09-02
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
1557-1565
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2067149824
Cited by
614
References
50
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beat-to-Beat QT Interval Variability: Novel Evidence for Repolarization Lability in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1557
The paper
Berger, R. D., Kasper, E. K., Baughman, K. L., Marban, E., Calkins, H., & Tomaselli, G. F. (1997). Beat-to-Beat QT Interval Variability: Novel Evidence for Repolarization Lability in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1557

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.