Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estradiol Therapy Combined With Progesterone and Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Postmenopausal Women

Gerhard, Marie, Walsh, Brian W., Tawakol, Ahmed, Haley, Elizabeth A., Creager, Shelly J., Seely, Ellen W., Ganz, Peter, Creager, Mark A.·1998·Circulation

Abstract

Background—Epidemiological studies indicate that estrogen replacement therapy decreases the risk of cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women. Estrogen may confer cardiovascular protection by improving endothelial function because it increases endothelium-dependent vasodilation. It is not known whether progesterone attenuates the beneficial effects of estrogen on endothelial function. Methods and Results—Seventeen postmenopausal women with mild hypercholesterolemia were enrolled in a placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the effect of transdermal estradiol, with and without vaginal micronized progesterone, on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in a peripheral conduit artery. Brachial artery diameter was measured with high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography. To assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation, brachial artery diameter was determined at baseline and after a flow stimulus induced by reactive hyperemia. To assess endothelium-independent vasodilation, brachial artery diameter was measured after administration of sublingual nitroglycerin. During estradiol therapy, reactive hyperemia caused an 11.1±1.0% change in brachial artery diameter compared with 4.7±0.6% during placebo therapy (P<0.001). Progesterone did not significantly attenuate this improvement. During combined estrogen and progesterone therapy, flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery was 9.6±0.8% (P=NS versus estradiol alone). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was not altered by estradiol therapy, either with or without progesterone, compared with placebo. There was a modest decrease in total and LDL cholesterol during treatment both with estradiol alone and when estradiol was combined with progesterone (all P<0.001 versus placebo). In a multivariate analysis that included serum estradiol, progesterone, total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, blood pressure, and heart rate, only the estradiol level was a significant predictor of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Conclusions—The addition of micronized progesterone does not attenuate the favorable effect of estradiol on endothelium-dependent vasodilation. The vasoprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy may extend beyond its beneficial actions on lipids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.98.12.1158

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gerhard, M., Walsh, B. W., Tawakol, A., Haley, E. A., Creager, S. J., Seely, E. W., Ganz, P., & Creager, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1998-09-22
Volume
98
Issue
12
Pages
1158-1163
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2144795879
Cited by
296
References
3
FWCI
22.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.