Cited by 365Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Gender-linked hypertension in offspring of lard-fed pregnant rats

Khan, Imran Y., Taylor, Paul D., Dekou, Vasia, Seed, Paul T., Lakasing, Lorin, Graham, Delyth, Dominiczak, Anna F., Hanson, Mark A. +1 more·2003·Hypertension

Abstract

Epidemiological studies suggest an association between maternal nutrition and offspring cardiovascular disease. We previously demonstrated endothelial dysfunction and abnormal aortic fatty acid composition in adult female offspring of rats fed animal lard during pregnancy. We have now further investigated this model. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a control breeding diet (5.3% fat) or a diet rich in lard (25.7% fat) 10 days before and throughout pregnancy and lactation. Male and female offspring were implanted with radiotelemeters for recording of blood pressure, heart rate, and activity at 80, 180, and 360 days of age. Reactivity to acetylcholine and to nitric oxide were assessed in isolated small mesenteric arteries from 80- and 180-day-old littermates. Systolic blood pressure (awake phase) was raised in female offspring (180 days: offspring of control, 130.7±1.6 mm Hg, n=5, versus offspring of lard-fed, 138.1±2.9, n=5, P =0.029; 360 days: offspring of control, 129.7±3.7 mm Hg, n=6, versus offspring of lard-fed, 142.1±3.2, n=6, P =0.005). Diastolic blood pressure was also raised at 180 days (offspring of control, 87.6±1.0 mm Hg, n=5, versus offspring of lard-fed, 94.7±2.6, n=5, P =0.011). Blood pressure was not raised in male offspring. Endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine was blunted in male and female offspring of lard-fed dams (80 and 180 days). Feeding a diet rich in lard to pregnant rats leads to gender-related cardiovascular dysfunction in normally fed offspring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000047511.97879.fc

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, I. Y., Taylor, P. D., Dekou, V., Seed, P. T., Lakasing, L., Graham, D., Dominiczak, A. F., Hanson, M. A., & Poston, L.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2003-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
168-175
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2118705787
Cited by
365
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
22.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
maternal nutrition, lard, pregnancy, offspring hypertension, sex differences, endothelial dysfunction, acetylcholine, nitric oxide, mesenteric arteries, cardiovascular disease, blood pressure, lactation
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Dietary Fats, Eating, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Heart Rate, Hypertension, Lipids, Male, Mesenteric Arteries, Myography, Pregnancy, Sex Factors, Telemetry, Vasodilation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review