CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,051Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 226 of the 226 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research

Open access
Pickering, Thomas G., Hall, John E., Appel, Lawrence J., Falkner, Bonita E., Graves, John, Hill, Martha N., Jones, Daniel W., Kurtz, Theodore, Sheps, Sheldon G., Roccella, Edward J.·2005·Hypertension
DOI 10.1161/01.hyp.0000150859.47929.8e
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Accurate measurement of blood pressure is essential to classify individuals, to ascertain blood pressure–related risk, and to guide management. The auscultatory technique with a trained observer and mercury sphygmomanometer continues to be the method of choice for measurement in the office, using the first and fifth phases of the Korotkoff sounds, including in pregnant women. The use of mercury is declining, and alternatives are needed. Aneroid devices are suitable, but they require frequent calibration. Hybrid devices that use electronic transducers instead of mercury have promise. The oscillometric method can be used for office measurement, but only devices independently validated according to standard protocols should be used, and individual calibration is recommended. They have the advantage of being able to take multiple measurements. Proper training of observers, positioning of the patient, and selection of cuff size are all essential. It is increasingly recognized that office measurements correlate poorly with blood pressure measured in other settings, and that they can be supplemented by self-measured readings taken with validated devices at home. There is increasing evidence that home readings predict cardiovascular events and are particularly useful for monitoring the effects of treatment. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory monitoring gives a better prediction of risk than office measurements and is useful for diagnosing white-coat hypertension. There is increasing evidence that a failure of blood pressure to fall during the night may be associated with increased risk. In obese patients and children, the use of an appropriate cuff size is of paramount importance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000150859.47929.8e

Cites

226 of 226 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–226 of 226

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Porcellati C. Nocturnal pressure is the true pressure. Blood Press Monit. 1996; 1 (Suppl 2): S81–S85.
  2. 10.1161/circ.103.9.1245 · DOI
  3. 10.1161/hyp.36.5.801 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/hyp.25.6.1276 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/circ.100.4.354 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/circ.103.9.1245 · DOI
  7. Pickering TG. White coat hypertension. In: Izzo JL Black HR eds. Hypertension Primer third edition. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2003.
  8. 10.1161/circ.102.10.1139 · DOI
  9. Low PA. Clinical Autonomic Disorders: Evaluation and Management second ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
  10. 10.1161/str.27.8.1316 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/circ.8.2.232 · DOI
  12. 10.1161/circ.88.5.8222141 · DOI
  13. Cates EM, Schlussel YR, James GD, Pickering TG. A validation study of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. J Ambul Monitor. 1990; 3: 149–154.
  14. Penaz J. Photo-electric measurement of blood pressure volume and flow in the finger. Digest Tenth International Conference Medical Biological Engineering. Dresden; 1973:104.
  15. Ware RW, Laenger CJ. Indirect blood pressure measurement by Doppler ultrasonic kinetoarteriography. Proc 20th Annual Conference Engineering Medical Biology. 1967; 9: 27–30.
  16. Wonka F, Thummler M, Schoppe A. Clinical test of a blood pressure measurement device with a wrist cuff. Blood Press Monit. 1996; 1: 361–366.
  17. 10.1161/hyp.36.4.484 · DOI
  18. Grim CE, Grim CM, Li J. Entering medical students who say they have been trained to take blood pressure do not follow American Heart Association guidelines. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12.
  19. 10.1001/archinte.1984.00350190188032 · DOI
  20. Beevers DG, Beevers M, Zezulka AV, Hornby R, Herod J. Standards for blood pressure measuring devices. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 294: 1614.
  21. O’Brien E, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Selecting the correct bladder according to distribution of arm circumference in the population (abstr). Hypertension. 1993; 11: 1149–1150.
  22. 10.1161/circ.68.4.6616774 · DOI
  23. Ljungvall P, Thorvinger B, Thulin T. The influence of a heart level pillow on the result of blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens. 1989; 3: 471–474.
  24. Rose G. Standardisation of observers in blood pressure measurement. Lancet. 1965; 10: 673–674.
  25. 10.1161/circ.28.1.20 · DOI
  26. 10.1001/jama.1967.03130150084015 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/hyp.35.5.1032 · DOI
  28. Myers MG. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home: the potential for reporting bias. Blood Press Monit. 1998; 3 (suppl 1): S19–S22.
  29. Imai Y, Ohkubo T, Tsuji I, Nagai K, Satoh H, Hisamichi S, Abe K. Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements in comparison to screening blood pressure measurements: a pilot study in Ohasama. Blood Press Monit. 1996; 1 (Suppl 2): S51–S58.
  30. 10.1161/hyp.32.2.255 · DOI
  31. Verdecchia P Bentivoglia M Providenza M Savino K Corea L. Reliability of home self-recorded arterial pressure in essential hypertension in relation to the stage of the disease. In: Germano G ed. Blood pressure recording in the clinical management of hypertension. Rome: Ediziono Pozzi; 1985: 40–42.
  32. 10.1161/circ.98.18.1892 · DOI
  33. 10.1161/hyp.31.2.712 · DOI
  34. Prineas RJ Elkwiry ZM. Epidemiology and measurement of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. In: Loggie JMH ed. Pediatric and Adolescent Hypertension. Boston MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992: 91–103.
  35. Brown MA Davis GK. Hypertension in pregnancy. In: Mancia G Chalmers J Julius S Saruta T Weber MA Ferrari AU Wilkinson IB ed. Manual of Hypertension. London: Harcourt Publishers Limited; 2002: 579–597.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,051

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J.
ORCID
Venue
Hypertension
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2005-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
142-161
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
DOI
10.1161/01.hyp.0000150859.47929.8e
OpenAlex
W2160801689
Semantic Scholar
cc608ac67b0966145e814f721be04e1b0f95eeb3
Cited by
2,051
References
226
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 144 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 133
FWCI
39.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
blood pressure measurement, auscultatory method, Korotkoff sounds, mercury sphygmomanometer, aneroid sphygmomanometer, oscillometric method, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, white coat hypertension, cuff size, observer training, pregnant women, laboratory animals, hypertension risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Auscultation, Automation, Blood Pressure Determination, Calibration, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Clinical Competence, Diagnostic Errors, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Organ Specificity, Oscillometry, Posture, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Blood Pressure Monitors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review