The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous Cardiac Baroreflex in Humans: Comparison With Drug-Induced Responses
Abstract
Abstract We compared two methods of assessment of baroreflex sensitivity in eight supine healthy volunteers during repeated baseline measurements and various conditions of cardiac autonomic blockade. The spontaneous baroreflex method involved computer scanning of recordings of continuous finger arterial pressure and electrocardiogram to locate sequences of three or more beats in which pressure spontaneously increased or decreased, with parallel changes in pulse intervals. The mean regression slope of all these sequences during each study condition was considered to represent the mean spontaneous baroreflex slope. In the drug-induced method, sigmoidal curves were constructed from data obtained by bolus injections of phenylephrine and nitroprusside; the tangents taken at the resting pressure of each of these curves were compared with the mean spontaneous baroreflex slopes. The two methods yielded slopes that were highly correlated ( r =.96, P <.001), with significant but similar intraindividual baseline variability. Atropine virtually eliminated the baroreflex slope; subsequent addition of propranolol did not alter it further. Propranolol or clonidine alone increased average baroreflex slope to the extent that they increased resting pulse interval ( r =.69 to .83). The spontaneous baroreflex method provides a reliable, noninvasive assessment of human vagal cardiac baroreflex sensitivity within its physiological operating range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Parati, G., Casadei, R., Groppelli, A., Di Rienzo, M., & Mancia, G. (1989) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.13.6.647 · Cited by 899
Cited by
Caminiti, G., Volterrani, M., Iellamo, F., Marazzi, G., Massaro, R., Miceli, M., Mammi, C., Piepoli, M., Fini, M., & Rosano, G. M. C. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.078 · Cited by 444
Parati, G., Mancia, G., Rienzo, M. D., & Castiglioni, P. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00446.2006 · Cited by 325
Human sympathetic and vagal baroreflex responses to sequential nitroprusside and phenylephrine
Rudas, L., Crossman, A. A., Morillo, C. A., Halliwill, J. R., Tahvanainen, K. U. O., Kuusela, T. A., & Eckberg, D. L. (1999) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.5.h1691 · Cited by 294
Relationships between features of autonomic cardiovascular control and cognitive performance
Duschek, S., Muckenthaler, M., Werner, N., & Reyes del Paso, G. A. (2009) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.003 · Cited by 249
Sympathetic control of short-term heart rate variability and its pharmacological modulation.
Elghozi, J., & Julien, C. (2007) · Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00502.x · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Parlow, J., Viale, J.-P., Annat, G., Hughson, R., & Quintin, L.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1058-1068
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2012414737
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spontaneous Cardiac Baroreflex in Humans: Comparison With Drug-Induced Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1058
- The paper
- Parlow, J., Viale, J.-P., Annat, G., Hughson, R., & Quintin, L. (1995). Spontaneous Cardiac Baroreflex in Humans: Comparison With Drug-Induced Responses. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.