The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods.
Open accessAbstract
Because of its simplicity, widespread availability, relatively low cost, and lack of adverse effects, M-mode echocardiography has become the most widely used technique for measurement of human left ventricular mass. Necropsy comparison studies have yielded formulas for anatomically accurate estimation of left ventricular mass in patients with normally shaped ventricles using left ventricular measurements by either Penn or American Society of Echocardiography conventions, but M-mode methods are less accurate in abnormally shaped ventricles. The standard error of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular mass measurements is approximately 40 g under difficult clinical recording conditions and 30 g or less for research studies of stable subjects. Interstudy variability of mass estimates appeared somewhat lower, resulting in 95% confidence limits for serial change up to 58 g for individual subjects and up to 10 g for study populations of 34 patients or more. The accuracy of M-mode echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass is similar to that of contrast angiography but may be exceeded by newer methods with greater cost or radiation exposure, including magnetic resonance imaging, cine-computed tomography, and three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction. Identification of left ventricular hypertrophy needs to take into account the influence of sex and body size, the variables that most influence normal ventricular mass, with provisional criteria for recognition of hypertrophy being left ventricular mass index over 134 g/m2 in men and above 110 g/m2 in women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of Blood Pressure in the Development of Congestive Heart Failure: The Framingham Study
Kannel, W. B., Castelli, W. P., McNamara, P. M., McKee, P. A., & Feinleib, M. (1972) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197210192871601 · Cited by 603
Cited by
Lorenz, C., Walker, E., Morgan, V., Klein, S., & Graham, T. (1999) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.3109/10976649909080829 · Cited by 717
Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Left Atrial Remodeling in Competitive Athletes
Pelliccia, A., Maron, B. J., Di Paolo, F. M., Biffi, A., Quattrini, F. M., Pisicchio, C., Roselli, A., Caselli, S., & Culasso, F. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.052 · Cited by 443
Montgomery, H. E., Clarkson, P., Dollery, C. M., Prasad, K., Losi, M.-A., Hemingway, H., Statters, D., Jubb, M., Girvain, M., Varnava, A., et al. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.3.741 · Cited by 362
Biondi, B. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.85.12.4701 · Cited by 356
Ethnic Differences in Left Ventricular Remodeling in Highly-Trained Athletes
Basavarajaiah, S., Boraita, A., Whyte, G., Wilson, M., Carby, L., Shah, A., & Sharma, S. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.061 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Devereux, R. B.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2_pt_2
- Pages
- II19-26
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2149949469
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.9.2_pt_2.ii19
- The paper
- Devereux, R. B. (1987). Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.9.2_pt_2.ii19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.