The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat brain measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Open accessAbstract
We studied the effect of focal cerebral ischemia on the "state" of brain water using proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced in five halothane-anesthetized rats via tandem occlusion of the left common carotid artery and the left middle cerebral artery. The proton transverse relaxation time, the proton density, and the water diffusion coefficient were measured at various times from the same region of brain tissue from 1.5 to 168 hours after occlusion. Early measurements indicated significant changes in the transverse relaxation time (p = 0.004) and water diffusion coefficient (p = 0.002) of ischemic brain tissue compared with a homologous region from the contralateral hemisphere. However, the transverse relaxation time, proton density, and water diffusion coefficient in ischemic brain tissue showed different temporal evolutions over the study period. Diffusion coefficient weighting was superior to relaxation time and proton density weighting for the visualization of early cerebral ischemia. Our data suggest that nuclear magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive in detecting changes in proton-associated parameters during early cerebral ischemia and confirm significant changes (p less than or equal to 0.01) in the temporal evolution of transverse relaxation times, proton densities, and diffusion coefficients following middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Cited by
Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI.
Le Bihan, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1119 · Cited by 1,571
Niendorf, T., Dijkhuizen, R. M., Norris, D. G., van Lookeren Campagne, M., & Nicolay, K. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360607 · Cited by 570
Theoretical Model for Water Diffusion in Tissues
Szafer, A., Zhong, J., & Gore, J. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330516 · Cited by 521
Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function
Le Bihan, D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006 · Cited by 498
Lu, H., Jensen, J. H., Ramani, A., & Helpern, J. A. (2006) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1020 · Cited by 420
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, R. A., Ordidge, R. J., Helpern, J. A., Chopp, M., Rodolosi, L. C., & Peck, D.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 802-808
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2020382599
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat brain measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.22.6.802
- The paper
- Knight, R. A., Ordidge, R. J., Helpern, J. A., Chopp, M., Rodolosi, L. C., & Peck, D. (1991). Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat brain measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.22.6.802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.