The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neocortical Neural Sprouting, Synaptogenesis, and Behavioral Recovery After Neocortical Infarction in Rats
Abstract
Background and Purpose Neuroanatomical plasticity is well described in lesions of the hippocampus but remains a subject of some controversy in the neocortex. The purpose of the present study was to measure the neocortical distribution and density of expression of proteins known to be involved in neurite growth or synaptogenesis and to correlate the neocortical expression with behavioral recovery after a focal neocortical infarction. Focal neocortical infarction creates a circumscribed lesion in the neocortex that provides a denervation stimulus for neurite growth and synaptogenesis. Methods Unilateral neocortical ischemia was induced in male spontaneously hypertensive Wistar rats (n=4 per time point) by permanent occlusion of the distal middle cerebral artery and ipsilateral common carotid artery. To determine the spatial and temporal distribution of neurite growth and/or synaptogenesis, GAP-43, a growth-associated protein expressed on axonal growth cones, and synaptophysin, a calcium-binding protein found on synaptic vesicles, were examined by immunohistochemical techniques. The reaction product was measured, and the distribution was recorded. Since the resulting infarction included a portion of the forelimb neocortex, behavioral assessments of forelimb function that used the foot-fault test of Hernandez and Schallert were performed on the same rats used for immunohistochemical studies. Recovery times were 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after surgery. Results Both GAP-43 and synaptophysin proteins demonstrated statistically significant increases in the density of immunoreaction product as determined by optical density measurements in the neocortex of infarcted rats compared with sham controls. The GAP-43 was elevated to statistically significant levels in forelimb, hindlimb, and parietal neocortical regions medial and lateral to the infarction only at days 3, 7, and 14. In contrast, synaptophysin demonstrated no statistically significant changes in expression at 3 or 7 days but demonstrated statistically significant increases at 14, 30, and 60 days in the forelimb, hindlimb, and parietal neocortical regions medial and lateral to the infarction as well as in the contralateral parietal neocortex. Behavioral assessment of forelimb function indicated impairment of forelimb placement on the side contralateral to the infarction that trended toward control values at 14 days and was not significantly different from controls by 30 days. Conclusions These data support the occurrence of neurite growth followed by synaptogenesis in the neocortex, ipsilateral and contralateral to neocortical ischemia, in a pattern that corresponds both spatially and temporally with behavioral recovery. Thus, neuroanatomical remodeling in the neocortex provides a mechanism for recovery of function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turner, A. M., & Greenough, W. T. (1985) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)90525-6 · Cited by 459
Cloning of human GAP 43: Growth association and ischemic resurgence
Ng, S.-C., de la Monte, S. M., Conboy, G. L., Karns, L. R., & Fishman, M. C. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90197-3 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour
Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2735 · Cited by 1,938
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke
Dimyan, M. A., & Cohen, L. G. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200 · Cited by 732
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727
Extensive Cortical Rewiring after Brain Injury
Dancause, N., Barbay, S., Frost, S. B., Plautz, E. J., Chen, D., Zoubina, E. V., Stowe, A. M., & Nudo, R. J. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3256-05.2005 · Cited by 704
Metadata
- Authors
- Stroemer, R. P., Kent, T. A., & Hulsebosch, C. E.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2135-2144
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2007000124
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neocortical Neural Sprouting, Synaptogenesis, and Behavioral Recovery After Neocortical Infarction in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.26.11.2135
- The paper
- Stroemer, R. P., Kent, T. A., & Hulsebosch, C. E. (1995). Neocortical Neural Sprouting, Synaptogenesis, and Behavioral Recovery After Neocortical Infarction in Rats. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.11.2135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.