Cited by 704Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNerve injury and regenerationMotor Control and Adaptation

Extensive Cortical Rewiring after Brain Injury

Open access
Dancause, Numa, Barbay, Scott, Frost, Shawn B., Plautz, Erik J., Chen, Daofen, Zoubina, Elena V., Stowe, Ann M., Nudo, Randolph J.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previously, we showed that the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) underwent neurophysiological remodeling after injury to the primary motor cortex (M1). In the present study, we examined cortical connections of PMv after such lesions. The neuroanatomical tract tracer biotinylated dextran amine was injected into the PMv hand area at least 5 months after ischemic injury to the M1 hand area. Comparison of labeling patterns between experimental and control animals demonstrated extensive proliferation of novel PMv terminal fields and the appearance of retrogradely labeled cell bodies within area 1/2 of the primary somatosensory cortex after M1 injury. Furthermore, evidence was found for alterations in the trajectory of PMv intracortical axons near the site of the lesion. The results suggest that M1 injury results in axonal sprouting near the ischemic injury and the establishment of novel connections within a distant target. These results support the hypothesis that, after a cortical injury, such as occurs after stroke, cortical areas distant from the injury undergo major neuroanatomical reorganization. Our results reveal an extraordinary anatomical rewiring capacity in the adult CNS after injury that may potentially play a role in recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3256-05.2005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodent and primate models of stroke, axonal sprouting and the formation of new connections occurs in motor, somatosensory and premotor areas.

    “In rodent and primate models of stroke, axonal sprouting and the formation of new connections occurs in motor, somatosensory and premotor areas1–4.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Discussion reports novel connections between ventral premotor cortex (PMv) and somatosensory area S1 after an M1 infarct in squirrel monkeys. The section on axonal trajectories proposes sprouting but says the precise branching location can only be inferred indirectly. The paper does not itself demonstrate the claimed changes across rodent and primate models or in all three listed cortical areas; its section on other motor areas reports no significant change in PMv connectivity there. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stroke induces axonal sprouting and the formation of new connections in peri-infarct cortex that link premotor, motor, somatosensory and association areas.

    “Stroke induces axonal sprouting and the formation of new connections in peri-infarct cortex that link premotor, motor, somatosensory and association areas1–4.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Discussion reports new connections between ventral premotor cortex and somatosensory area S1 after an infarct in primary motor cortex. The ‘Alteration of axonal trajectory at the lesion border’ section says sprouting near the infarct border is inferred, not directly located. The paper does not establish new connections linking all four named types of area, including association areas. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • After stroke, axonal sprouting has been demonstrated in mice, rats and non-human primates.

    “After stroke, axonal sprouting has been demonstrated in mice, rats and non-human primates1–4,10,38.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Materials and Methods and Results describe ischemic infarcts in squirrel monkeys, supporting the non-human-primate portion of the multiply cited sentence. But “Alteration of axonal trajectory at the lesion border” says that sprouting near the infarct is inferred indirectly from changed axonal trajectories, rather than directly demonstrated. This paper does not study mice or rats. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, Plautz EJ, Stowe AM, Friel KM, Nudo RJ (2005) Ipsilateral con- nections of the ventral premotor cortex in a New World primate. J Comp Neurol, in press.
  2. Glees P (1961) Experimental neurology. Oxford: Clarendon.
  3. Pearson PP, Arnold PB, Oladehin A, Li CX, Waters RS (2001) Large-scale cortical reorganization following forelimb deafferentation in rat does not involve plasticity of intracortical connections. Exp Brain Res 138:8 -25.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dancause, N., Barbay, S., Frost, S. B., Plautz, E. J., Chen, D., Zoubina, E. V., Stowe, A. M., & Nudo, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
Corresponding author
Dancause, Numa
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-11-02
Volume
25
Issue
44
Pages
10167-10179
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2162075347
Cited by
704
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 50
FWCI
33.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (HD02528)
  • National Institutes of Health (HD02528)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS030853, R01NS030853, NS30853)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD002528, HD-02528)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
cortical reorganization, ventral premotor cortex, stroke, axonal sprouting, cortical connectivity, primary somatosensory cortex, biotinylated dextran amine, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Saimiri

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review