The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Angioplasty and Stenting for Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy: Initial Experience
Abstract
Background and Purpose Endarterectomy for recurrent carotid stenosis after endarterectomy has a significantly higher complication rate than the original operation. Angioplasty and stenting may offer a useful alternative treatment for these patients. Methods Between September 1994 and April 1996, 22 patients had 25 carotid arteries treated with angioplasty and stenting for postendarterectomy restenosis. All patients had an independent neurological examination and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale evaluation before and after the procedure. Patients were treated with aspirin and ticlopidine. All patients were requested to return at 6 months for follow-up angiography. The mean patient age was 69±7 years, and the mean elapsed time from endarterectomy was 73±69 months. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were symptomatic. Results Mean stenosis was reduced from 79±13% before the procedure to 1.8±3.6% after stenting. One patient had a minor stroke, for a complication rate of 4% per treated artery. In the eight patients who returned for 6-month angiography, mean stenosis was 19.4±4.4% and restenosis (≥50% stenosis) did not occur. Conclusions In a small series, angioplasty and stenting appear to be safe and well tolerated for the treatment of postendarterectomy restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Cited by
Kastrup, A., Gröschel, K., Krapf, H., Brehm, B. R., Dichgans, J., & Schulz, J. B. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000058160.53040.5f · Cited by 567
Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry
Wholey, M. H., Al‐Mubarek, N., & Wholey, M. H. (2003) · Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1002/ccd.10645 · Cited by 462
Qureshi, A. I., Luft, A. R., Sharma, M., Guterman, L. R., & Hopkins, L. N. (2000) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200006000-00014 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadav, J. S., Roubin, G. S., King, P., Iyer, S., & Vitek, J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2075-2079
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2035430083
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angioplasty and Stenting for Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy: Initial Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.11.2075
- The paper
- Yadav, J. S., Roubin, G. S., King, P., Iyer, S., & Vitek, J. (1996). Angioplasty and Stenting for Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy: Initial Experience. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.11.2075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.