The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Model in Pigs: Rapid Edema Development in Perihematomal White Matter
Abstract
Background and Purpose The mechanisms underlying brain injury from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are complex and poorly understood. To comprehensively examine pathophysiological and pathochemical alterations after ICH and to examine the effects of hematoma removal on these processes, we developed a physiologically controlled, reproducible, large-animal model of ICH in pigs (weight, 6 to 8 kg). Methods We produced lobar hematomas by pressure-controlled infusions of 1.7 mL of autologous blood into the right frontal hemispheric white matter over 15 minutes. We froze brains in situ at 1, 3, 5, and 8 hours after hematoma induction and cut coronal sections for hematoma assessment, morphological brain examination, and immunohistochemical and water content determinations. Results At 1 hour after blood infusion, “translucent” white matter areas were present directly adjacent to the hematoma. These markedly edematous regions had a greater than 10% increase in water content (>85%) compared with the contralateral white matter (73%), and this increased water content persisted through 8 hours. In addition, these areas were strongly immunoreactive for serum proteins. Intravascular Evans blue dye failed to penetrate into the brain tissue at all time points, demonstrating that this serum protein accumulation and edema development were not due to increased blood-brain barrier permeability. Conclusions Experimental lobar ICH in pigs models a prominent pathological feature of human ICH, ie, early perihematomal edema. Our findings suggest that serum proteins, originating from the hematoma, accumulate in adjacent white matter and result in rapid and prolonged edema after ICH. This interstitial edema likely corresponds to the low densities on CT scans and the hyperintensities on T 2 -weighted MR images that surround intracerebral hematomas acutely after human ICH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Self-citationIntracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets
Keep, R. F., Hua, Y., & Xi, G. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70104-7 · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationBroderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citationMolecular pathophysiology of cerebral edema
Stokum, J. A., Gerzanich, V., & Simard, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x15617172 · Cited by 587
Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Zazulia, A. R., Diringer, M. N., Derdeyn, C. P., & Powers, W. J. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.6.1167 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, K. R., Xi, G., Hua, Y., Kleinholz, M., de Courten-Myers, G. M., Myers, R. E., Broderick, J. P., & Brott, T. G.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 490-497
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2035239697
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Model in Pigs: Rapid Edema Development in Perihematomal White Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.3.490
- The paper
- Wagner, K. R., Xi, G., Hua, Y., Kleinholz, M., de Courten-Myers, G. M., Myers, R. E., Broderick, J. P., & Brott, T. G. (1996). Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Model in Pigs: Rapid Edema Development in Perihematomal White Matter. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.3.490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.