Cited by 62Health Policy Implementation ScienceObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation of Obesity Science Into Clinical Practice: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Open access
Laddu, Deepika, Neeland, Ian J., Carnethon, Mercedes, Stanford, Fatima C., Mongraw-Chaffin, Morgana, Barone Gibbs, Bethany, Ndumele, Chiadi E., Longenecker, Chris T., Chung, Misook L., Rao, Goutham, on behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Hypertension; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing·2024·Circulation

Abstract

Obesity is a recognized public health epidemic with a prevalence that continues to increase dramatically in nearly all populations, impeding progress in reducing incidence rates of cardiovascular disease. Over the past decade, obesity science has evolved to improve knowledge of its multifactorial causes, identifying important biological causes and sociological determinants of obesity. Treatments for obesity have also continued to develop, with more evidence-based programs for lifestyle modification, new pharmacotherapies, and robust data to support bariatric surgery. Despite these advancements, there continues to be a substantial gap between the scientific evidence and the implementation of research into clinical practice for effective obesity management. Addressing barriers to obesity science implementation requires adopting feasible methodologies and targeting multiple levels (eg, clinician, community, system, policy) to facilitate the delivery of obesity-targeted therapies and maximize the effectiveness of guideline-driven care to at-need patient populations. This scientific statement (1) describes strategies shown to be effective or promising for enhancing translation and clinical application of obesity-based research; (2) identifies key gaps in the implementation of obesity science into clinical practice; and (3) provides guidance and resources for health care professionals, health care systems, and other stakeholders to promote broader implementation and uptake of obesity science for improved population-level obesity management. In addition, advances in implementation science that hold promise to bridge the know-do gap in obesity prevention and treatment are discussed. Last, this scientific statement highlights implications for health research policy and future research to improve patient care models and optimize the delivery and sustainability of equitable obesity-related care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/cir.0000000000001221

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Roundtable on Obesity Solutions: Year in Review 2022. Accessed August 3 2023. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26855/roundtable-on-obesity-solutions-year-in-review-2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Laddu, D., Neeland, I. J., Carnethon, M., Stanford, F. C., Mongraw-Chaffin, M., Barone Gibbs, B., Ndumele, C. E., Longenecker, C. T., Chung, M. L., Rao, G., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Hypertension; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing
Venue
Circulation
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
150
Issue
1
Pages
e7-e19
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4398144590
Cited by
62
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • Office of Science
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL148503)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR019456)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U24DK132733, UE5DK137285)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, implementation science, clinical translation, obesity treatment, lifestyle modification, obesity pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, cardiovascular disease, health policy, health equity, implementation barriers, obesity prevention
MeSH terms
American Heart Association, Humans, Obesity, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review