Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulse Wave Analysis of the Aortic Pressure Waveform in Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Open access
Denardo, Scott J., Nandyala, Ramavathi, Freeman, Gregory L., Pierce, Gary L., Nichols, Wilmer W.·2010·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background— The effect of moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) on ventricular/vascular coupling and the aortic pressure waveform (AoPW) has been well described, but the effect of severe LVSD has not. Methods and Results— We used noninvasive, high-fidelity tonometry of the radial artery and a mathematical transfer function to generate the AoPW in 25 treated patients with LVSD (mean LV ejection fraction, 24±8.8%; range, 11% to 40%; 21 patients <30%). Pulse wave analysis of the AoPW was used to characterize ventricular/vascular coupling and compared with pulse wave analysis performed in 25 normal subjects matched for age, gender, height, body mass index, and heart rate. Measurements obtained using pulse wave analysis in LVSD patients indicated features of poor LV stroke performance and also reduced indices of arterial stiffness: increased travel time of the pressure wave (147±10 ms versus 132±21 ms; P <0.001); decreased systolic duration of reflected wave (134±24 ms versus 167±26 ms; P <0.001); ejection duration (277±22 ms versus 299±25 ms; P <0.008); percent systolic duration (32±5.3% versus 35±4.0%; P <0.02); aortic systolic pressure (100±16 mm Hg versus 121±16 mm Hg; P <0.001); unaugmented pressure (24±6.3 mm Hg versus 32±6.4 mm Hg; P <0.001); augmented pressure (4.8±3.1 mm Hg versus 9.6±4.5 mm Hg; P <0.001); pulse pressure (28±7.4 mm Hg versus 42±9.5 mm Hg; P <0.001); augmentation index (12±6.6% versus 23±7.6%; P <0.006); wasted LV effort (5.3±2.8×10 2 dyne sec/cm 2 versus 17±10×10 2 dyne sec/cm 2 ; P <0.001); systolic pressure time index (17±4.1×10 2 mm Hg-sec/min versus 23±4.2×10 2 mm Hg sec/min; P <0.001); and pressure systolic area (383±121 mm Hg sec/min versus 666±150 mm Hg sec/min; P <0.001). Conclusions— Severe LVSD causes measurable changes in the AoPW. Standardization of AoPW findings in LVSD patients may allow for the clinical use of radial artery pulse wave analysis to noninvasively determine the severity of dysfunction and aid in logical therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.109.862383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Denardo, S. J., Nandyala, R., Freeman, G. L., Pierce, G. L., & Nichols, W. W.
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2010-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
149-156
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2129656895
Cited by
190
References
1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulse Wave Analysis of the Aortic Pressure Waveform in Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circheartfailure.109.862383
The paper
Denardo, S. J., Nandyala, R., Freeman, G. L., Pierce, G. L., & Nichols, W. W. (2010). Pulse Wave Analysis of the Aortic Pressure Waveform in Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.109.862383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.