Cited by 12Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Variation in Patient Profiles and Outcomes in US and Non-US Subgroups of the Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX Trial

Open access
Vaduganathan, Muthiah, Harrington, Robert A., Stone, Gregg W., Steg, Ph. Gabriel, Gibson, C. Michael, Hamm, Christian W., Price, Matthew J., Prats, Jayne +4 more·2016·Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

Background—: The Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX trial demonstrated superiority of cangrelor in reducing ischemic events at 48 hours in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with clopidogrel. Methods and Results—: We analyzed all patients included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis in US (n=4097; 37.4%) and non-US subgroups (n=6845; 62.6%). The US cohort was older, had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, and had more frequently undergone prior cardiovascular procedures. US patients more frequently underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina (77.9% versus 46.2%). Almost all US patients (99.1%) received clopidogrel loading doses of 600 mg, whereas 40.5% of non-US patients received 300 mg. Bivalirudin was more frequently used in US patients (56.7% versus 2.9%). At 48 hours, rates of the primary composite end point were comparable in the US and non-US cohorts (5.5% versus 5.2%; P =0.53). Cangrelor reduced rates of the primary composite end point compared with clopidogrel in US (4.5% versus 6.4%; odds ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.53–0.92]) and in non-US patients (4.8% versus 5.6%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.69–1.05]; interaction P =0.26). Similarly, rates of the key secondary end point, stent thrombosis, were reduced by cangrelor in both regions. Rates of Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO)–defined severe bleeding were low and not significantly increased by cangrelor in either region. Conclusions—: Despite broad differences in clinical profiles and indications for percutaneous coronary intervention by region in a large global cardiovascular clinical trial, cangrelor consistently reduced rates of ischemic end points compared with clopidogrel without an excess in severe bleeding in both the US and non-US subgroups. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01156571.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circinterventions.116.003612

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • International trials of various pharmacotherapies have sometimes found discordant results in patients enrolled in the United States than seen in overall trial results.

    “International trials of various pharmacotherapies have sometimes found discordant results in patients enrolled in the United States than seen in overall trial results.19–32”
  • The reasons for discordant US results range from low numbers of patients enrolled in the United States to potential differences in background medical management or in patient risk profiles.

    “The reasons range from low numbers of patients enrolled in the United States to potential differences in background medical management or in patient risk profiles.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]CHAMPION PHOENIX – protocol & SAP supplement Available at: http://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815/suppl_file/nejmoa1300815_protocol.pdf. Assessed December 21, 2015. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaduganathan, M., Harrington, R. A., Stone, G. W., Steg, P. G., Gibson, C. M., Hamm, C. W., Price, M. J., Prats, J., Deliargyris, E. N., Mahaffey, K. W., White, H. D., & Bhatt, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.V., D.L.B); Stanford University Medical School, CA (R.A.H., K.W.M.); Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York City, NY (G.W.S.); FACT (French Alliance for Cardiovascular clinical Trials), DHU FIRE, INSERM Unité 1148, Université Paris-Diderot, and Hôpital Bichat, Assistance-Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, France, and NHLI, Imperial College, Royal...
Corresponding author
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2016-06
Volume
9
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1941-7632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7640
OpenAlex
W2430995757
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medicines Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
cangrelor, clopidogrel, platelet aggregation inhibition, percutaneous coronary intervention, stent thrombosis, bleeding complications, subgroup analysis, cross-national comparison, antiplatelet therapy, ischemic events, bivalirudin, stable angina, clopidogrel loading dose, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Clopidogrel, Adenosine Monophosphate, Aged, Brazil, Coronary Thrombosis, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Platelet Aggregation, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Platelet Function Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thailand, Ticlopidine, Time Factors, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Intention to Treat Analysis, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review