Cited by 71Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Survivor Treatment Selection Bias and Outcomes Research: A Case Study of Surgery in Infective Endocarditis

Sy, Raymond W., Bannon, Paul G., Bayfield, Matthew S., Brown, Chris, Kritharides, Leonard·2009·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background— Recent studies in infective endocarditis have suggested an association between surgery and reduced mortality. However, these studies did not account for survivor treatment selection bias, which is an underrecognized source of error in observational studies. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the effects of survivor bias on surgical outcomes in infective endocarditis. Methods and Results— We studied 223 patients admitted with left-sided infective endocarditis between 1996 and 2006 and compared all-cause mortality between surgically treated and medically treated patients using Cox regression analysis. Propensity scores were used to account for selection bias, and time-dependent analyses were performed to account for survivor bias. Compared with medical patients (n=161), surgical patients (n=62) had lower mortality during a median follow-up of 5.2 years (32% versus 51%; P =0.02) with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.88, P =0.01). After adjustment for baseline differences in propensity for surgery and risk of mortality, there remained a significant benefit for surgery (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88; P =0.02). However, this was diminished after time-dependent analysis (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.40; P =0.39). Conditional Kaplan–Meier analyses confirmed the effect of survivor bias because the apparent benefit of surgery was primarily attributable to excess mortality in the medical group during early hospitalization when surgery was not frequently performed. Conclusions— Survivor bias significantly affects the evaluation of surgical outcomes in infective endocarditis, and it should be considered in other areas of outcomes research where randomized controlled trials are not feasible. Survivor bias is not corrected by propensity analysis alone but may be reduced by time-dependent survival analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.109.857938

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Baddour LM, Wilson RW, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Bolger A, Levison M, Ferrieri P, Gerber M, Tani L, Gewitz M, Tong D, Steckelberg J, Bal- timore R, Shulman S, Burns J, Falace D, Newburger J, Pallasch T, Takahashi M, Taubert K. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications. Circulation. 2005;111: e394 -e433.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sy, R. W., Bannon, P. G., Bayfield, M. S., Brown, C., & Kritharides, L.
Affiliations
Sydney South West Area Health Service (AU)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2009-09
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
469-474
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2889166221
Cited by
71
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
survivorship bias, treatment selection bias, infective endocarditis, cardiac surgery, left-sided endocarditis, all-cause mortality, surgical versus medical treatment, propensity score analysis, bias in observational studies
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Endocarditis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Selection Bias, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Hospital Mortality, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Survivors, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review