Cited by 3,362Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE)

Nashef, S.A.M., Roques, F., Michel, P., Gauducheau, E., Lemeshow, S., Salamon, R.·1999·European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To construct a scoring system for the prediction of early mortality in cardiac surgical patients in Europe on the basis of objective risk factors. METHODS: The EuroSCORE database was divided into developmental and validation subsets. In the former, risk factors deemed to be objective, credible, obtainable and difficult to falsify were weighted on the basis of regression analysis. An additive score of predicted mortality was constructed. Its calibration and discrimination characteristics were assessed in the validation dataset. Thresholds were defined to distinguish low, moderate and high risk groups. RESULTS: The developmental dataset had 13,302 patients, calibration by Hosmer Lemeshow Chi square was (8) = 8.26 (P < 0.40) and discrimination by area under ROC curve was 0.79. The validation dataset had 1479 patients, calibration Chi square (10) = 7.5, P < 0.68 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.76. The scoring system identified three groups of risk factors with their weights (additive % predicted mortality) in brackets. Patient-related factors were age over 60 (one per 5 years or part thereof), female (1), chronic pulmonary disease (1), extracardiac arteriopathy (2), neurological dysfunction (2), previous cardiac surgery (3), serum creatinine >200 micromol/l (2), active endocarditis (3) and critical preoperative state (3). Cardiac factors were unstable angina on intravenous nitrates (2), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (30-50%: 1, <30%: 3), recent (<90 days) myocardial infarction (2) and pulmonary systolic pressure >60 mmHg (2). Operation-related factors were emergency (2), other than isolated coronary surgery (2), thoracic aorta surgery (3) and surgery for postinfarct septal rupture (4). The scoring system was then applied to three risk groups. The low risk group (EuroSCORE 1-2) had 4529 patients with 36 deaths (0.8%), 95% confidence limits for observed mortality (0.56-1.10) and for expected mortality (1.27-1.29). The medium risk group (EuroSCORE 3-5) had 5977 patients with 182 deaths (3%), observed mortality (2.62-3.51), predicted (2.90-2.94). The high risk group (EuroSCORE 6 plus) had 4293 patients with 480 deaths (11.2%) observed mortality (10.25-12.16), predicted (10.93-11.54). Overall, there were 698 deaths in 14,799 patients (4.7%), observed mortality (4.37-5.06), predicted (4.72-4.95). CONCLUSION: EuroSCORE is a simple, objective and up-to-date system for assessing heart surgery, soundly based on one of the largest, most complete and accurate databases in European cardiac surgical history. We recommend its widespread use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00134-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EuroSCORE is a model developed in 1999 for predicting mortality in hospital for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

    “For example, EuroSCORE is a model developed in 1999 for predicting mortality in hospital for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.99”

    From Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nashef, S. A. M., Roques, F., Michel, P., Gauducheau, E., Lemeshow, S., & Salamon, R.
Affiliations
Royal Papworth Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Nashef, S.A.M.
Venue
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Published
1999-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
9-13
ISSN
  • 1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-734X
OpenAlex
W2156202966
Cited by
3,362
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 209 · 2014: 200 · 2013: 232 · 2012: 223
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
EuroSCORE, cardiac surgery, mortality prediction, risk scoring, preoperative risk factors, postoperative mortality, risk stratification, discrimination and calibration, thoracic aortic surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, emergency surgery, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine, endocarditis, pulmonary hypertension, previous cardiac surgery, age and sex risk factors
MeSH terms
Europe, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Logistic Models, Survival Analysis, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review