Cited by 104Research Data Management PracticesEthics in Clinical ResearchPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

The Importance of Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Toward More Open Science

Open access
Ross, Joseph S., Lehman, Richard, Gross, Cary P.·2012·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965798

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparent and reproducible science offers well-established benefits: enhanced research reliability and credibility, increased applicability of results, and reduced bias and waste of resources.

    “Transparent and reproducible science offers well-established benefits: enhanced research reliability and credibility, increased applicability of results, and reduced bias and waste of resources [10–14].”

    From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The opening section (page unavailable) says clinical-trial data sharing enables validation, reproduction, and better use of research findings; it also describes selective reporting that biases the available evidence. The Way Forward says fuller access can improve understanding of treatment safety and effectiveness. These passages support several claimed benefits, but the paper focuses on clinical-trial data sharing rather than establishing every listed benefit for transparent and reproducible science generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By sharing data and code, additional analyses are enabled, as well as data verifiability.

    “By sharing data and code, additional analyses (which can generate new hypotheses and future research) are enabled, as well as data verifiability [10–12].”

    From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The opening section says that making clinical research data available enables validation and reproduction; “Data Sharing Trials and Tribulations” discusses additional analyses by independent groups. The paper supports those benefits of sharing data, but the passages do not address sharing code. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several major clinical research funders and biomedical journals have adopted policies supporting or mandating the use of reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, which include encouraging protocol registration, conflict of interest disclosure, and funding.

    “Several major clinical research funders and biomedical journals have adopted policies supporting or mandating the use of reporting guidelines such as CONSORT [10, 17–19], which include encouraging protocol registration, conflict of interest disclosure, and funding.”

    From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, J. S., Lehman, R., & Gross, C. P.
Affiliations
Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2012-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
238-240
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2142147900
Cited by
104
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K08AG032886)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
clinical trial data sharing, data transparency, cardiovascular clinical trials, research data access
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Science, United States, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review