The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postconditioning the Human Heart
Open accessAbstract
Background— In animal models, brief periods of ischemia performed just at the time of reperfusion can reduce infarct size, a phenomenon called postconditioning. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study, we investigated whether postconditioning may protect the human heart during coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results— Thirty patients, submitted to coronary angioplasty for ongoing acute myocardial infarction, contributed to the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control or a postconditioning group. After reperfusion by direct stenting, control subjects underwent no further intervention, whereas postconditioning was performed within 1 minute of reflow by 4 episodes of 1-minute inflation and 1-minute deflation of the angioplasty balloon. Infarct size was assessed by measuring total creatine kinase release over 72 hours. Area at risk and collateral blood flow were estimated on left ventricular and coronary angiograms. No adverse events occurred in the postconditioning group. Determinants of infarct size, including ischemia time, size of the area at risk, and collateral flow, were comparable between the 2 groups. Area under the curve of creatine kinase release was significantly reduced in the postconditioning compared with the control group, averaging 208 984±26 576 compared with 326 095±48 779 (arbitrary units) in control subjects, ie, a 36% reduction in infarct size. Blush grade, a marker of myocardial reperfusion, was significantly increased in postconditioned compared with control subjects: 2.44±0.17 versus 1.95±0.27, respectively ( P <0.05). Conclusions— This study suggests that postconditioning by coronary angioplasty protects the human heart during acute myocardial infarction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yellon, D. M., & Hausenloy, D. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra071667 · Cited by 3,797
Ischemia and reperfusion—from mechanism to translation
Eltzschig, H. K., & Eckle, T. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2507 · Cited by 3,382
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target
Hausenloy, D. J., & Yellon, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci62874 · Cited by 2,357
ROS and redox signaling in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection
Cadenas, S. (2018) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.024 · Cited by 820
Cardiovascular remodelling in coronary artery disease and heart failure
Heusch, G., Libby, P., Gersh, B., Yellon, D., Böhm, M., Lopaschuk, G., & Opie, L. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60107-0 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Staat, P., Rioufol, G., Piot, C., Cottin, Y., Cung, T. T., L’Huillier, I., Aupetit, J.-F., Bonnefoy, E., Finet, G., André-Fouët, X., & Ovize, M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2005-10-04
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2143-2148
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2131015734
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postconditioning the Human Heart. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.558122
- The paper
- Staat, P., Rioufol, G., Piot, C., Cottin, Y., Cung, T. T., L’Huillier, I., Aupetit, J.-F., Bonnefoy, E., Finet, G., André-Fouët, X., & Ovize, M. (2005). Postconditioning the Human Heart. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.558122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.