The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Ventilatory Classification System in Patients With Heart Failure
Abstract
Background— Ventilatory efficiency, commonly assessed by the minute ventilation (V̇ e )–carbon dioxide production (V̇ co 2 ) slope, is a powerful prognostic marker in the heart failure population. The purpose of the present study is to refine the prognostic power of the V̇ e /V̇ co 2 slope by developing a ventilatory class system that correlates V̇ e /V̇ co 2 cut points to cardiac-related events. Methods and Results— Four hundred forty-eight subjects diagnosed with heart failure were included in this analysis. The V̇ e /V̇ co 2 slope was determined via cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Subjects were tracked for major cardiac events (mortality, transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation) for 2 years after cardiopulmonary exercise testing. There were 81 cardiac-related events (64 deaths, 10 heart transplants, and 7 left ventricular assist device implantations) during the 2-year tracking period. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the overall V̇ e /V̇ co 2 slope classification scheme was significant (area under the curve: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73 to 0.83], P <0.001). On the basis of test sensitivity and specificity, the following ventilatory class system was developed: (1) ventilatory class (VC) I: ≤29; (2) VC II: 30.0 to 35.9; (3) VC III: 36.0 to 44.9; and (4) VC IV: ≥45.0. The numbers of subjects in VCs I through IV were 144, 149, 112, and 43, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed event-free survival for subjects in VC I, II, III, and IV was 97.2%, 85.2%, 72.3%, and 44.2%, respectively (log-rank 86.8; P <0.001). Conclusions— A multiple-level classificatory system based on exercise V̇ e /V̇ co 2 slope stratifies the burden of risk for the entire spectrum of heart failure severity. Application of this classification is therefore proposed to improve clinical decision making in heart failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fletcher, G. F., Balady, G. J., Amsterdam, E. A., Chaitman, B., Eckel, R., Fleg, J., Froelicher, V. F., Leon, A. S., Piña, I. L., Rodney, R., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc3901.095960 · Cited by 1,923
Piña, I. L., Apstein, C. S., Balady, G. J., Belardinelli, R., Chaitman, B. R., Duscha, B. D., Fletcher, B. J., Fleg, J. L., Myers, J. N., & Sullivan, M. J. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000055013.92097.40 · Cited by 1,030
Self-citation
Cited by
Balady, G. J., Arena, R., Sietsema, K., Myers, J., Coke, L., Fletcher, G. F., Forman, D., Franklin, B., Guazzi, M., Gulati, M., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181e52e69 · Cited by 1,964
Self-citationGuazzi, M., Adams, V., Conraads, V., Halle, M., Mezzani, A., Vanhees, L., Arena, R., Fletcher, G. F., Forman, D. E., Kitzman, D. W., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31826fb946 · Cited by 822
Self-citationExercise Intolerance in Patients With Heart Failure
Del Buono, M. G., Arena, R., Borlaug, B. A., Carbone, S., Canada, J. M., Kirkman, D. L., Garten, R., Rodriguez-Miguelez, P., Guazzi, M., Lavie, C. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.072 · Cited by 477
Self-citationCaminiti, G., Volterrani, M., Iellamo, F., Marazzi, G., Massaro, R., Miceli, M., Mammi, C., Piepoli, M., Fini, M., & Rosano, G. M. C. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.078 · Cited by 444
Grassi, B., & Quaresima, V. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.21.9.091313 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Arena, R., Myers, J., Abella, J., Peberdy, M. A., Bensimhon, D., Chase, P., & Guazzi, M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2007-05-08
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2410-2417
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2132948786
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 95.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.