Cited by 158Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Trends and cardiovascular mortality effects of state-level blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension in the United States.

Ezzati, Majid, Oza, Shefali, Danaei, Goodarz, Murray, Christopher J.L.·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Blood pressure is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality and has lifestyle and healthcare determinants that vary across states. Only self-reported hypertension status is measured at the state level in the United States. Our aim was to estimate levels and trends in state-level mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), the prevalence of uncontrolled systolic hypertension, and cardiovascular mortality attributable to all levels of higher-than-optimal SBP. Methods and Results— We estimated the relationship between actual SBP/uncontrolled hypertension and self-reported hypertension, use of blood pressure medication, and a set of health system and sociodemographic variables in the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We applied this relationship to identical variables from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate state-specific mean SBP and uncontrolled hypertension. We used the comparative risk assessment methods to estimate cardiovascular mortality attributable to higher-than-optimal SBP. In 2001–2003, age-standardized uncontrolled hypertension prevalence was highest in the District of Columbia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina (18% to 21% for men and 24% to 26% for women) and lowest in Vermont, Minnesota, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Colorado (15% to 16% for men and ≈21% for women). Women had a higher prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension than men in every state by 4 (Arizona) to 7 (Kansas) percentage points. In the 1990s, uncontrolled hypertension in women increased the most in Idaho and Oregon (by 6 percentage points) and the least in the District of Columbia and Mississippi (by 3 percentage points). For men, the worst-performing states were New Mexico and Louisiana (decrease of 0.6 and 1.3 percentage points), and the best-performing states were Vermont and Indiana (decrease of 4 and 3 percentage points). Age-standardized cardiovascular mortality attributable to higher-than-optimal SBP ranged from 200 to 220 per 100 000 (Minnesota and Massachusetts) to 360 to 370 per 100 000 (District of Columbia and Mississippi) for women and from 210 per 100 000 (Colorado and Utah) to 370 per 100 000 (Mississippi) and 410 per 100 000 (District of Columbia) for men. Conclusions— Lifestyle and pharmacological interventions for lowering blood pressure are particularly needed in the South and Appalachia, and with emphasis on control among women. Self-reported data on hypertension diagnosis from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System can be used to obtain unbiased state-level estimates of blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension as benchmarks for priority setting and for designing and evaluating intervention programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.732131

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Waller M, Leutzinger C, Condon K. Objectives and design of the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Methods, American Statistical Association National Meeting, Dallas, Tex, 1998. Alexandria, VA: American Sta- tistical Association; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezzati, M., Oza, S., Danaei, G., & Murray, C. J. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-02-19
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
905-914
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2107045578
Cited by
158
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U36 CCU300430-23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular mortality, state-level variation, hypertension prevalence trends, attributable mortality, sex differences, sociodemographic factors, health system factors, cardiovascular risk factors, United States states, NHANES, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, comparative risk assessment, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Drug Utilization, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Hypertension, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Risk Factors, Self Disclosure, Systole, United States, Health Behavior, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review