Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome

Open access
Lurz, Philipp, Coats, Louise, Khambadkone, Sachin, Nordmeyer, Johannes, Boudjemline, Younes, Schievano, Silvia, Muthurangu, Vivek, Lee, Twin Yen, Parenzan, Giovanni, Derrick, Graham, Cullen, Seamus, Walker, Fiona, Tsang, Victor, Deanfield, John, Taylor, Andrew M., Bonhoeffer, Philipp·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation was introduced in the year 2000 as a nonsurgical treatment for patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction. Methods and Results— Between September 2000 and February 2007, 155 patients with stenosis and/or regurgitation underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. This led to significant reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure (from 63±18 to 45±13 mm Hg, P <0.001) and right ventricular outflow tract gradient (from 37±20 to 17±10 mm Hg, P <0.001). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 83.7 months (median 28.4 months). Freedom from reoperation was 93% (±2%), 86% (±3%), 84% (±4%), and 70% (±13%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Freedom from transcatheter reintervention was 95% (±2%), 87% (±3%), 73% (±6%), and 73% (±6%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Survival at 83 months was 96.9%. On time-dependent analysis, the first series of 50 patients (log-rank test P <0.001) and patients with a residual gradient >25 mm Hg (log-rank test P =0.01) were associated with a higher risk of reoperations. Conclusions— Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation resulted in the ability to avoid surgical right ventricular outflow tract revision in the majority of cases. This procedure might reduce the number of operations needed over the total lifetime of patients with right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery conduits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.735779

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Lurz, P., Coats, L., Khambadkone, S., Nordmeyer, J., Boudjemline, Y., Schievano, S., Muthurangu, V., Lee, T. Y., Parenzan, G., Derrick, G., Cullen, S., Walker, F., Tsang, V., Deanfield, J., Taylor, A. M., & Bonhoeffer, P.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
117
Issue
15
Pages
1964-1972
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2011009799
Cited by
481
References
20
FWCI
29.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.735779
The paper
Lurz, P., Coats, L., Khambadkone, S., Nordmeyer, J., Boudjemline, Y., Schievano, S., Muthurangu, V., Lee, T. Y., Parenzan, G., Derrick, G., Cullen, S., Walker, F., Tsang, V., Deanfield, J., Taylor, A. M., & Bonhoeffer, P. (2008). Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.735779

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.