Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Divergent Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor–Related Remodeling Responses in Heart Failure: Role of Nuclear Factor-κB and Inflammatory Activation

Open access
Hamid, Tariq, Gu, Yan, Ortines, Roger V., Bhattacharya, Chhandashri, Wang, Guangwu, Xuan, Yu-Ting, Prabhu, Sumanth D.·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Although preclinical data suggested that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) neutralization in heart failure (HF) would be beneficial, clinical trials of TNF antagonists were paradoxically negative. We hypothesized that TNF induces opposing inflammatory and remodeling responses in HF that are TNF-receptor (TNFR) specific. Methods and Results— HF was induced in wild-type (WT), TNFR1 −/− , and TNFR2 −/− mice via coronary ligation. Compared with WT HF, 4-week postinfarction survival was significantly improved in both TNFR1 −/− and TNFR2 −/− HF. Compared with sham, WT HF hearts exhibited significant remodeling with robust activation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and JNK2 and upregulation of TNF, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-10. Compared with WT HF, TNFR1 −/− HF exhibited (1) improved remodeling, hypertrophy, and contractile function; (2) less apoptosis; and (3) diminished NF-κB, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and JNK2 activation and cytokine expression. In contrast, TNFR2 −/− HF showed exaggerated remodeling and hypertrophy, increased border zone fibrosis, augmented NF-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, higher IL-1β and IL-6 gene expression, greater activated macrophages, and greater apoptosis. Oxidative stress and diastolic function were improved in both TNFR1 −/− and TNFR2 −/− HF. In H9c2 cardiomyocytes, sustained NF-κB activation was proapoptotic, an effect dependent on TNFR1 signaling, whereas TNFR2 overexpression attenuated TNF-induced NF-κB activation. Conclusions— TNFR1 and TNFR2 have disparate and opposing effects on remodeling, hypertrophy, NF-κB, inflammation, and apoptosis in HF: TNFR1 exacerbates, whereas TNFR2 ameliorates, these events. However, signaling through both receptors is required to induce diastolic dysfunction and oxidative stress. TNFR-specific effects in HF should be considered when therapeutic anti-TNF strategies are developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.108.802918

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Hamid, T., Gu, Y., Ortines, R. V., Bhattacharya, C., Wang, G., Xuan, Y.-T., & Prabhu, S. D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-03-17
Volume
119
Issue
10
Pages
1386-1397
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1999015670
Cited by
274
References
31
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Divergent Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor–Related Remodeling Responses in Heart Failure: Role of Nuclear Factor-κB and Inflammatory Activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.108.802918
The paper
Hamid, T., Gu, Y., Ortines, R. V., Bhattacharya, C., Wang, G., Xuan, Y.-T., & Prabhu, S. D. (2009). Divergent Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor–Related Remodeling Responses in Heart Failure: Role of Nuclear Factor-κB and Inflammatory Activation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.802918

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.