Cited by 484Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy with dabigatran or warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial

Dans, Antonio L., Connolly, Stuart J., Wallentin, Lars, Yang, Sean, Nakamya, Juliet, Brueckmann, Martina, Ezekowitz, Michael, Oldgren, Jonas +3 more·2013·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial showed that dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID was superior and dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this subgroup analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in patients who did and did not receive concomitant antiplatelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: All comparisons used a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustments made for risk factors for bleeding. A time-dependent analysis was performed when comparing patients with concomitant antiplatelets with those without. Of 18 113 patients, 6952 (38.4%) received concomitant aspirin or clopidogrel at some time during the study. Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in reducing stroke and systemic embolism, whether patients received antiplatelets (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.70-1.25) or not (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.15; interaction P=0.738). There were fewer major bleeds than warfarin in both subgroups (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.00 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96 for patients who did not; interaction P=0.794). Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID reduced the primary outcome of stroke and systemic embolism in comparison with warfarin. This effect seemed attenuated among patients who used antiplatelets (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.08) in comparison with those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.72; P for interaction=0.058). Major bleeding was similar to warfarin regardless of antiplatelet use (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.15 for patients who did not; P for interaction=0.875). In the time-dependent analysis, concomitant use of a single antiplatelet seemed to increase the risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.42-1.82). Dual antiplatelet seemed to increased this even more (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.79-2.98). The absolute risks were lowest on dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID in comparison with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID or warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant antiplatelet drugs appeared to increase the risk for major bleeding in RE-LY without affecting the advantages of dabigatran over warfarin. Choosing between dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID requires a careful assessment of characteristics that influence the balance between benefit and harm. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.112.115386

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dans, A. L., Connolly, S. J., Wallentin, L., Yang, S., Nakamya, J., Brueckmann, M., Ezekowitz, M., Oldgren, J., Eikelboom, J. W., Reilly, P. A., & Yusuf, S.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2013-02-05
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
634-640
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2165626532
Cited by
484
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 8
FWCI
33.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
dabigatran, warfarin, antiplatelet therapy, aspirin, clopidogrel, atrial fibrillation, stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, RE-LY trial, direct oral anticoagulants, drug interactions, non-inferiority, bleeding risk stratification, time-dependent analysis, subgroup analysis, anticoagulant efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Dabigatran, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Benzimidazoles, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Embolism, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Pyridines, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Warfarin, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review