Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Open access
Cheng, Susan, Claggett, Brian, Correia, Andrew W., Shah, Amil M., Gupta, Deepak K., Skali, Hicham, Ni, Hanyu, Rosamond, Wayne D., Heiss, Gerardo, Folsom, Aaron R., Coresh, Josef, Solomon, Scott D.·2014·Circulation
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.113.008506
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background—: The extent to which the relative contributions of traditional cardiovascular risk factors to incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) may have changed over time remains unclear. Methods and Results—: We studied 13 541 participants (56% women, 26% black) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, aged 52 to 66 years and free of CVD at exams in 1987 through 1989, 1990 through 1992, 1993 through 1995, or 1996 through 1998. At each examination, we estimated the population attributable risks (PAR) of traditional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) for the 10-year incidence of CVD. Overall, the PAR of all risk factors combined appeared to decrease from the late 1980s to the late 1990s (0.58 to 0.53). The combined PAR was higher in women than men in 1987 through 1989 (0.68 versus 0.51, P <0.001) but not by the late 1990s (0.58 versus 0.48, P =0.08). The combined PAR was higher in blacks than whites in the late 1980s (0.67 versus 0.57, P =0.049), and this difference was more pronounced by the late 1990s (0.67 versus 0.48, P =0.002). By the late 1990s, the PAR of hypertension had become higher in women than men ( P =0.02) and also appeared higher in blacks than whites ( P =0.08). By the late 1990s, the PAR of diabetes mellitus remained higher in women than men ( P <0.0001) and in blacks than whites ( P <0.0001). Conclusions—: The contribution to CVD of all traditional risk factors combined is greater in blacks than whites, and this difference may be increasing. The contributions of hypertension and diabetes mellitus remain especially high, in women as well as blacks. These findings underscore the continued need for individual as well as population approaches to CVD risk factor modification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.008506

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, S., Claggett, B., Correia, A. W., Shah, A. M., Gupta, D. K., Skali, H., Ni, H., Rosamond, W. D., Heiss, G., Folsom, A. R., Coresh, J., & Solomon, S. D.
Venue
Circulation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2014-09-02
Volume
130
Issue
10
Pages
820-828
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.113.008506
OpenAlex
W1974090295
Cited by
160
References
10
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.113.008506
The paper
Cheng, S., Claggett, B., Correia, A. W., Shah, A. M., Gupta, D. K., Skali, H., Ni, H., Rosamond, W. D., Heiss, G., Folsom, A. R., Coresh, J., & Solomon, S. D. (2014). Temporal Trends in the Population Attributable Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.008506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.