Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flipped C-Terminal Ends of APOA1 Promote ABCA1-Dependent Cholesterol Efflux by Small HDLs

He, Yi, Pavanello, Chiara, Hutchins, Patrick M., Tang, Chongren, Pourmousa, Mohsen, Vaisar, Tomas, Song, Hyun D., Pastor, Richard W., Remaley, Alan T., Goldberg, Ira J., Costacou, Tina, Sean Davidson, W., Bornfeldt, Karin E., Calabresi, Laura, Segrest, Jere P., Heinecke, Jay W.·2024·Circulation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) predicts cardiovascular disease independently of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Isolated small HDL particles are potent promoters of macrophage CEC by the ABCA1 (ATP-binding cassette transporter A1) pathway, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. METHODS: We used model system studies of reconstituted HDL and plasma from control and lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT)–deficient subjects to investigate the relationships among the sizes of HDL particles, the structure of APOA1 (apolipoprotein A1) in the different particles, and the CECs of plasma and isolated HDLs. RESULTS: We quantified macrophage and ABCA1 CEC of 4 distinct sizes of reconstituted HDL. CEC increased as particle size decreased. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of chemically cross-linked peptides and molecular dynamics simulations of APOA1, the major protein of HDL, indicated that the mobility of C-terminus of that protein was markedly higher and flipped off the surface in the smallest particles. To explore the physiological relevance of the model system studies, we isolated HDL from LCAT-deficient subjects, whose small HDLs (like reconstituted HDLs) are discoidal and composed of APOA1, cholesterol, and phospholipid. Despite their very low plasma levels of HDL particles, these subjects had normal CEC. In both the LCAT-deficient subjects and control subjects, the CEC of isolated extra-small HDL (a mixture of extra-small and small HDL by calibrated ion mobility analysis) was 3- to 5-fold greater than that of the larger sizes of isolated HDL. Incubating LCAT-deficient plasma and control plasma with human LCAT converted extra-small and small HDL particles into larger particles, and it markedly inhibited CEC. CONCLUSIONS: We present a mechanism for the enhanced CEC of small HDLs. In smaller particles, the C-termini of the 2 antiparallel molecules of APOA1 are “flipped” off the lipid surface of HDL. This extended conformation allows them to engage with ABCA1. In contrast, the C-termini of larger HDLs are unable to interact productively with ABCA1 because they form a helical bundle that strongly adheres to the lipid on the particle. Enhanced CEC, as seen with the smaller particles, predicts decreased cardiovascular disease risk. Thus, extra-small and small HDLs may be key mediators and indicators of the cardioprotective effects of HDL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.123.065959

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The binding of Fab and F'(ab)2 fragments to ApoE on discoidal particles suggest that the ApoE proteins are in an antiparallel conformation similar to the conformation described for apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1).

    “The binding of Fab and F’(ab)2 fragments to ApoE on discoidal particles suggest that the ApoE proteins are in an antiparallel conformation similar to the conformation described for apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) [17, 59, 60].”

    From ApoE lipoproteins in the central nervous system under homeostasis and role in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Results section, under “Probing the Structure of APOA1 in r-HDLs With Tandem Mass Spectrometry” (page unavailable), describes an antiparallel APOA1 double-belt model around discoidal HDL and says structural and cross-linking evidence supports it. The cited paper does not report Fab or F’(ab)2 binding to ApoE or establish that ApoE has a similar conformation, so it supports the APOA1 comparison but not the sentence’s inference about ApoE. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence from ApoA1, a related apolipoprotein, suggests that the degree of lipidation of discoidal ApoA1 alters its conformation.

    “Evidence from ApoA1, a related apolipoprotein, also suggests that the degree of lipidation of discoidal ApoA1 alters its conformation [59].”
  • The degree of lipidation would be expected to alter ApoE structure in both discoidal and spherical lipoproteins.

    “This is potentially applicable to ApoE and therefore the degree of lipidation would be expected to alter ApoE structure in both discoidal and spherical lipoproteins.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61217-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nm.2937 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJMe1012520 · DOI
  4. 10.1194/jlr.R800088-JLR200 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/physrev.00005.2005 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305485 · DOI
  7. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317178 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179283 · DOI
  9. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.199158 · DOI
  10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1001689 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1056/NEJMoa1409065 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00126-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1194/jlr.R024513 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nm0797-744 · DOI
  15. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818143 · DOI
  16. 10.1161/JAHA.121.024754 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308685 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000878 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1194/jlr.D900003-JLR200 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/bi7023354 · DOI
  21. 10.1373/clinchem.2014.228114 · DOI
  22. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.100586 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.003 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nmeth.1192 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1721181115 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00913 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1021/bi101301g · DOI
  29. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000175751.30616.13 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/JAHA.119.014572 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99196-9 · DOI
  32. 10.1074/jbc.274.45.31755 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.M111.260422 · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.R700014200 · DOI
  35. 10.1194/jlr.R800010-JLR200 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nprot.2017.113 · DOI
  37. 10.1172/JCI106586 · DOI
  38. 10.1194/jlr.M600403-JLR200 · DOI
  39. 10.1373/clinchem.2010.155333 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)41536-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M508169200 · DOI
  42. 10.1194/jlr.M068874 · DOI
  43. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.145789 · DOI
  44. 10.1194/jlr.R082313 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41467-022-32437-3 · DOI
  46. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306052 · DOI
  47. 10.1194/P900038-JLR200 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.07.042 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, Y., Pavanello, C., Hutchins, P. M., Tang, C., Pourmousa, M., Vaisar, T., Song, H. D., Pastor, R. W., Remaley, A. T., Goldberg, I. J., Costacou, T., Sean Davidson, W., Bornfeldt, K. E., Calabresi, L., Segrest, J. P., & Heinecke, J. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2024-03-05
Volume
149
Issue
10
Pages
774-787
ISSN
  • 0009-7322
  • 1524-4539
Cited by
35
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review