Cited by 1,390Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

HDL cholesterol efflux capacity and incident cardiovascular events

Open access
Rohatgi, Anand, Khera, Amit, Berry, Jarett D., Givens, Edward G., Ayers, Colby R., Wedin, Kyle E., Neeland, Ian J., Yuhanna, Ivan S. +3 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration plays a causal role in atherosclerosis. A more important factor may be HDL cholesterol efflux capacity, the ability of HDL to accept cholesterol from macrophages, which is a key step in reverse cholesterol transport. We investigated the epidemiology of cholesterol efflux capacity and its association with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes in a large, multiethnic population cohort. METHODS: We measured HDL cholesterol level, HDL particle concentration, and cholesterol efflux capacity at baseline in 2924 adults free from cardiovascular disease who were participants in the Dallas Heart Study, a probability-based population sample. The primary end point was atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as a first nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization or death from cardiovascular causes. The median follow-up period was 9.4 years. RESULTS: In contrast to HDL cholesterol level, which was associated with multiple traditional risk factors and metabolic variables, cholesterol efflux capacity had minimal association with these factors. Baseline HDL cholesterol level was not associated with cardiovascular events in an adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 1.99). In a fully adjusted model that included traditional risk factors, HDL cholesterol level, and HDL particle concentration, there was a 67% reduction in cardiovascular risk in the highest quartile of cholesterol efflux capacity versus the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.55). Adding cholesterol efflux capacity to traditional risk factors was associated with improvement in discrimination and reclassification indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Cholesterol efflux capacity, a new biomarker that characterizes a key step in reverse cholesterol transport, was inversely associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort. (Funded by the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation and others.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1409065

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies suggest HDL has a complex role in atherogenesis and dysfunctional HDL may be more relevant to atherosclerosis than the HDL-C level.

    “Recent studies suggest that HDL has a complex role in atherogenesis and that the presence of dysfunctional HDL may be more relevant to the development of atherosclerosis than the HDL-C level. 93-95”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [95]

  • The rate of cholesterol efflux has been associated with cardiovascular events and deaths.

    “The rate of cholesterol efflux has been associated with the prevalence of CHD, independent of the HDL-C concentration [24], with cardiovascular events and deaths (Fig. 4) [25, 26].”

    From HDL cholesterol: reappraisal of its clinical relevance (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rohatgi, A., Khera, A., Berry, J. D., Givens, E. G., Ayers, C. R., Wedin, K. E., Neeland, I. J., Yuhanna, I. S., Rader, D. R., de Lemos, J. A., & Shaul, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
371
Issue
25
Pages
2383-2393
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2109429564
Cited by
1,390
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
139.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001105)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL1813, K08HL118131)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
HDL cholesterol efflux capacity, HDL cholesterol, reverse cholesterol transport, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular biomarkers, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular mortality, risk reclassification
MeSH terms
Adult, Biological Transport, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lipoproteins, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Incidence, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review