Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dapagliflozin Enhances Arterial and Venous Compliance During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the CAMEO-DAPA Trial

Tada, Atsushi, Burkhoff, Daniel, Naser, Jwan A., Harada, Tomonari, Pourmussa, Bianca, Reddy, Yogesh N.V., Jensen, Michael D., Carter, Rickey E., Demmer, Ryan T., Testani, Jeffrey M., Chirinos, Julio A., Borlaug, Barry A.·2024·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance are typically impaired in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), contributing to hemodynamic congestion with stress. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors reduce hemodynamic congestion and improve clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF, but the mechanisms remain unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that Dapagliflozin would improve systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance during exercise in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: In this secondary analysis from the CAMEO-DAPA trial (Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Trial), 37 patients with HFpEF (mean age 68 ± 9 years, women 65%) underwent invasive hemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography at baseline and following treatment for 24 weeks with Dapagliflozin or placebo. Radial artery pressure (BP) was measured continuously using a fluid-filled catheter with transformation to aortic pressure, central hemodynamics were measured using high-fidelity micromanometers, and stressed blood volume was estimated from hemodynamic indices fit to a comprehensive cardiovascular model. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant effect of Dapagliflozin on resting BP, but Dapagliflozin reduced systolic BP during peak exercise (estimated treatment difference [ETD], −18.8 mm Hg [95% CI, −33.9 to −3.7] P =0.016). Reduction in BP was related to improved exertional total arterial compliance (ETD, 0.06 mL/mm Hg/m 2 [95% CI, 0.003–0.11] P =0.039) and aortic root characteristic impedance (ETD, −2.6 mm Hg/mL*sec [95% CI: −5.1 to −0.03] P =0.048), with no significant effect on systemic vascular resistance. Dapagliflozin reduced estimated stressed blood volume at rest and during peak exercise (ETD, −292 mm Hg [95% CI, −530 to −53] P =0.018), and improved venous capacitance evidenced by a decline in ratio of estimated stressed blood volume to total blood volume (ETD, −7.3% [95% CI, −13.3 to −1.3] P =0.020). Each of these effects of Dapagliflozin at peak exercise were also observed during matched 20W exercise intensity. Improvements in total arterial compliance and estimated stressed blood volume were correlated with decreases in body weight, and reduction in systolic BP with treatment was correlated with the change in estimated stressed blood volume during exercise (r=0.40, P =0.019). Decreases in BP were correlated with reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise (r=0.56, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, treatment with Dapagliflozin improved systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance during exercise, while reducing aortic characteristic impedance, suggesting a reduction in arterial wall stiffness. These vascular effects may partially explain the clinical benefits with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in HFpEF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04730947.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.124.068788

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dapagliflozin reduces aortic stiffness, systolic BP and pulse pressure during exercise after 24 weeks, and these changes correlate with reductions in left ventricular filling pressures.

    “Treatment with the sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin was recently shown to reduce aortic stiffness, systolic BP and pulse pressure during exercise after just 24 weeks, and these changes were correlated with reductions in left ventricular filling pressures25.”

    From Effects of tirzepatide on circulatory overload and end-organ damage in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a secondary analysis of the SUMMIT trial (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results report lower exercise systolic BP, pulse pressure, and proximal aortic characteristic impedance after dapagliflozin treatment; the Discussion interprets the impedance change as likely reduced aortic wall stiffness. The Discussion and Abstract report that the reduction in exercise systolic BP correlated with reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, a measure of left ventricular filling pressure. Our copy does not report that the stiffness and pulse-pressure changes themselves correlated with filling-pressure reductions, as “these changes” suggests. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The magnitude of improvement in arterial compliance with dapagliflozin was correlated with the magnitude of weight loss.

    “The magnitude of improvement in arterial compliance with dapagliflozin was correlated with the magnitude of weight loss.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1001/jama.2023.2020 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.012 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.050 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/JAHA.121.021584 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41591-021-01536-x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065134 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119990 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.01.011 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/s12933-018-0750-8 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw241 · DOI
  13. 10.1161/hy1001.096106 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1161/JAHA.118.011457 · DOI
  15. 10.1152/ajpheart.00747.2020 · DOI
  16. 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.2.H424 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.131870 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.009 · DOI
  19. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157339 · DOI
  20. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.006023 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/clc.4960170212 · DOI
  22. 10.1152/ajpheart.00654.2003 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.12.012 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.01.005 · DOI
  25. 10.1152/ajpheart.00147.2011 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1023/a:1026563313952 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/B978-0-323-91391-1.00016-9 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.032 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.090092 · DOI
  31. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009156 · DOI
  32. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061828 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90494-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1161/01.cir.67.4.817 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90468-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tada, A., Burkhoff, D., Naser, J. A., Harada, T., Pourmussa, B., Reddy, Y. N. V., Jensen, M. D., Carter, R. E., Demmer, R. T., Testani, J. M., Chirinos, J. A., & Borlaug, B. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2024-09-24
Volume
150
Issue
13
Pages
997-1009
ISSN
  • 0009-7322
  • 1524-4539
Cited by
42
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review