Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 594

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Update: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Open access
Flynn, Joseph T., Daniels, Stephen R., Hayman, Laura L., Maahs, David M., McCrindle, Brian W., Mitsnefes, Mark, Zachariah, Justin P., Urbina, Elaine M.·2014·Hypertension

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has established roles in the evaluation and management of hypertension in adults but has only been applied to children and adolescents more recently.1 In 2008, the American Heart Association (AHA) issued the first set of consensus recommendations for performance and interpretation of ABPM in pediatrics. Since then, ABPM has found increasing use in children and adolescents, as recently summarized.2 The present document updates the 2008 AHA statement on the use of ABPM in the pediatric population3 with additional data published since the release of that report and also presents a revised interpretation schema. Because no outcome studies are yet available relating ABPM levels in children to outcomes such as myocardial infarction or stroke, these guidelines are largely driven by expert opinion, although they are also informed by available pediatric data on ABPM and surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease. ### Epidemiology of Hypertension High blood pressure (BP) is the leading risk factor–related cause of death throughout the world, accounting for 12.8% of all deaths, including 51% of stroke deaths and 45% of coronary heart disease deaths.4 In the United States, 33.0% of adults >20 years of age have hypertension.5 As our population continues to age, this will only increase, because 90% of people with normal BP at age 55 years will go on to develop hypertension in their lifetimes.6 The prevalence of hypertension in youths is also on the rise. US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1963 to 2002 showed a 2.3% increase in prehypertension and a 1% increase in hypertension from 1988 to 1999, with higher rates in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans.7 In fact, the entire distribution of childhood BP has shifted upward in the United States by 1.4 mm Hg for systolic BP (SBP) and 3.3 …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hyp.0000000000000007

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 594

Metadata

Authors
Flynn, J. T., Daniels, S. R., Hayman, L. L., Maahs, D. M., McCrindle, B. W., Mitsnefes, M., Zachariah, J. P., & Urbina, E. M.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2014-05
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
1116-1135
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2059898653
Cited by
594
References
15
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hyp.0000000000000007
The paper
Flynn, J. T., Daniels, S. R., Hayman, L. L., Maahs, D. M., McCrindle, B. W., Mitsnefes, M., Zachariah, J. P., & Urbina, E. M. (2014). Update: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.0000000000000007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.